Re: [fpc-pascal] packages: lazarus vs. fpc

2009-08-25 Thread Marc Santhoff
Am Dienstag, den 25.08.2009, 10:31 +0200 schrieb Jonas Maebe: > On 25 Aug 2009, at 08:55, Marc Santhoff wrote: > > > if a Makefile.fpc is generated by lazarus from a lazarus package (.lpi > > file), would this Makefile.fpc be sufficient for integrating the > > package > > into the fpc package tr

Re: [fpc-pascal] packages: lazarus vs. fpc

2009-08-25 Thread Marc Santhoff
Am Dienstag, den 25.08.2009, 10:17 +0200 schrieb Marco van de Voort: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 08:55:42AM +0200, Marc Santhoff wrote: > > if a Makefile.fpc is generated by lazarus from a lazarus package (.lpi > > file), would this Makefile.fpc be sufficient for integrating the package > > into the

Re: [fpc-pascal] packages: lazarus vs. fpc

2009-08-25 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 25 Aug 2009, at 08:55, Marc Santhoff wrote: if a Makefile.fpc is generated by lazarus from a lazarus package (.lpi file), would this Makefile.fpc be sufficient for integrating the package into the fpc package tree below the "extra" directory? There is no "extra" directory anymore since

Re: [fpc-pascal] packages: lazarus vs. fpc

2009-08-25 Thread Marco van de Voort
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 08:55:42AM +0200, Marc Santhoff wrote: > if a Makefile.fpc is generated by lazarus from a lazarus package (.lpi > file), would this Makefile.fpc be sufficient for integrating the package > into the fpc package tree below the "extra" directory? The base/extra separation has