On 07/25/2016 11:22 AM, geneb wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016, wkitt...@windstream.net wrote:
On 07/24/2016 10:15 AM, geneb wrote:
I don't know if you've looked at SWAG yet, but there's a couple of 32
bit CRC routines there.
hey gene! fancy seeing you here instead of the flightgear areas ;) ;) ;)
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016, wkitt...@windstream.net wrote:
On 07/24/2016 10:15 AM, geneb wrote:
I don't know if you've looked at SWAG yet, but there's a couple of 32 bit
CRC routines there.
hey gene! fancy seeing you here instead of the flightgear areas ;) ;) ;)
i do have all of SWAG here... back
wkitt...@windstream.net wrote:
On 07/24/2016 05:03 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Have you tried running your test case through a different
implementation? I
use http://www.wolfgang-ehrhardt.de/crchash_en.html
i'm trying to use only what is available in FPC... i will take a look at
others, tho
On 07/24/2016 10:15 AM, geneb wrote:
I don't know if you've looked at SWAG yet, but there's a couple of 32 bit
CRC routines there.
hey gene! fancy seeing you here instead of the flightgear areas ;) ;) ;)
i do have all of SWAG here... back in the day, we grabbed each new release as it
was ava
On 07/24/2016 06:41 AM, Tony Whyman wrote:
On 24/07/16 00:18, wkitt...@windstream.net wrote:
i've already checked the polynomial ($edb88320) is the same in both, the
original implementation (converted to TP4 in 1988) and this implementation...
Are you sure that you are dealing with a CRC algor
On 07/24/2016 05:12 AM, Giuliano Colla wrote:
What I'd do in your place would be to forget about strings, and use just an
array of bytes.
that's why i'm using a pchar, starting at var[0] and length(var)-1 ;)
This way you're sure that you don't have in the way the string length value
and some
On 07/24/2016 05:03 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Have you tried running your test case through a different implementation? I
use http://www.wolfgang-ehrhardt.de/crchash_en.html
i'm trying to use only what is available in FPC... i will take a look at others,
though...
[time passes]
ok, i loo
I don't know if you've looked at SWAG yet, but there's a couple of 32 bit
CRC routines there.
See here: http://swag.delphidabbler.com/
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
http://www.diy-cockpits.org/coll - Go Collimated or Go Home.
Some people
On 24/07/16 00:18, wkitt...@windstream.net wrote:
i've already checked the polynomial ($edb88320) is the same in both,
the original implementation (converted to TP4 in 1988) and this
implementation...
Are you sure that you are dealing with a CRC algorithm? ISO 8073 TP4
uses an arithmetic ch
Il 24/07/2016 01:18, wkitt...@windstream.net ha scritto:
this is driving me battier than i already am :(
i have a binary file that contains a record of data... the first field
of the data is a crc32 value of a string of characters... the string
of characters is lower cased before being fed to
wkitt...@windstream.net wrote:
this is driving me battier than i already am :(
i have a binary file that contains a record of data... the first field
of the data is a crc32 value of a string of characters... the string of
characters is lower cased before being fed to the crc32 function... i
n
11 matches
Mail list logo
