Marc Santhoff wrote:
No, it shows a warning message, no error.
The point is, the compiler finishes making a runnable program. I
personally don't want that to happen because it will make avoidable
OK, I now see what you mean. Luckily I pay close attention to any
Warnings that the compiler give
Am Montag, den 17.08.2009, 09:12 +0200 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
> Marc Santhoff wrote:
> >
> > the compiler runs and throws no error. Fine, but this way every class
>
> Because you did not instantiate any instances of that class. Here is the
> output after compiling my sample program with FPC
Marc Santhoff wrote:
the compiler runs and throws no error. Fine, but this way every class
Because you did not instantiate any instances of that class. Here is the
output after compiling my sample program with FPC 2.2.5
===
$ fpc test1.pas
Free Pascal Compiler ve
Am Sonntag, den 16.08.2009, 20:05 +0200 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
> On 16 Aug 2009, at 19:58, Marc Santhoff wrote:
>
> > Am Sonntag, den 16.08.2009, 12:00 +0200 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
> >>
> >
> >> Seems like there is a practical use-case for
> >> http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13957
> >> after
On 16 Aug 2009, at 19:58, Marc Santhoff wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 16.08.2009, 12:00 +0200 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
Seems like there is a practical use-case for
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13957
after all :)
Do I understand correctly that this patch allow me to remap the
warning
Am Sonntag, den 16.08.2009, 12:00 +0200 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
> On 16 Aug 2009, at 04:37, Marc Santhoff wrote:
>
> > What I want is to ensure not forgetting to override any method. The
> > compiler should stop on error when this happens.
> > How can this be done?
> >
> > (I know the compiler does e
On 16 Aug 2009, at 04:37, Marc Santhoff wrote:
What I want is to ensure not forgetting to override any method. The
compiler should stop on error when this happens.
How can this be done?
(I know the compiler does emit a warning, but switching to "stop on
warning" is o option for me.)
Seems li
