Maybe this can be used for debug/release.
I don't see how this can be used for the widgetsets.
Why not ? you can use
subtarget=gtk2-debug
How can I pass sub targets to fppkg?
fppkg -c
You can already use this now for cross-compiling. Under Linux you can
test it with:
- Copy ~/.fppkg/conf
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 16:03:08 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>[...]
> > Thanks.
> > Maybe this can be used for debug/release.
> > I don't see how this can be used for the widgetsets.
>
> Why not ? you can use
> subtarget=gtk2-debug
How can I pass sub targets to fppkg?
> > My dream is
2009/6/3 Michael Van Canneyt :
>
> Use Kubuntu ? I do, now.
I did for Kubuntu 9.04, and then had to revert back to 8.04 LTS
because 9.04 had to many graphics issues (X11 drawing bugs which I
reported and affected fpGUI, MSEgui and WINE). But damn, Kubuntu 9.04
did look beautiful.
>
> ls -lad .*
>
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
2009/6/3 Michael Van Canneyt :
lot more consistent in it's config locations across various KDE based
applications. And KDE is also a lot more consistent in it's UI across
various KDE based applications.
Issues I frequently see in Gnome:
* I e
2009/6/3 Michael Van Canneyt :
>
> Why ? Windows is even more of a mess as far as I'm concerned,
The only nice thing is you can query the system for some basic
applications: eg: I need to open a text file, I know notepad.exe will
exist. etc... At least now with the xdg-open command and it's vario
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
2009/6/3 Michael Van Canneyt :
I don't think the 'freedesktop' standard is much of a standard.
Like I said, it was a mistake to have followed the 'standard'.
Well if everybody thinks like that, then NOTHING will become a
standard. The "dot" file
2009/6/3 Michael Van Canneyt :
>
> I don't think the 'freedesktop' standard is much of a standard.
> Like I said, it was a mistake to have followed the 'standard'.
Well if everybody thinks like that, then NOTHING will become a
standard. The "dot" files idea is a mess, the FHS is a mess.
I greatly
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Giuliano Colla wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt ha scritto:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
2009/6/2 Michael Van Canneyt :
~user/.fppkg/build/
(or something like it)
Possibly the $HOME/.local/ directory. I have the following structure
in there, but I trie
Michael Van Canneyt ha scritto:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
2009/6/2 Michael Van Canneyt :
~user/.fppkg/build/
(or something like it)
Possibly the $HOME/.local/ directory. I have the following structure
in there, but I tried to find out on freedesktop.org or linux
stan
Mattias Gärtner wrote:
Zitat von Michael Van Canneyt :
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt schreef:
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Hi fpmake devels,
fpmake uses as ppu output directory for exam
2009/6/2 Michael Van Canneyt :
>
> What is the .local directory ? I don't have one, and I never heard of it.
> If it is again a so-called standard by freedesktop, then it's a nono.
I don't know, and like I mentioned, I tried to Google it, to see who
decided on the ~/.local/ and what everything is
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
2009/6/2 Michael Van Canneyt :
~user/.fppkg/build/
(or something like it)
Possibly the $HOME/.local/ directory. I have the following structure
in there, but I tried to find out on freedesktop.org or linux
standands what is recommend regarding
2009/6/2 Michael Van Canneyt :
>
> ~user/.fppkg/build/
>
> (or something like it)
Possibly the $HOME/.local/ directory. I have the following structure
in there, but I tried to find out on freedesktop.org or linux
standands what is recommend regarding the ~/.local/ directory, but I
couldn't find
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Mattias Gärtner wrote:
Zitat von Michael Van Canneyt :
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt schreef:
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Hi fpmake devels,
fpmake uses as ppu ou
Zitat von Michael Van Canneyt :
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt schreef:
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Hi fpmake devels,
fpmake uses as ppu output directory for example:
units/i386-linux/
A
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt schreef:
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Hi fpmake devels,
fpmake uses as ppu output directory for example:
units/i386-linux/
And there is no way to change this.
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt schreef:
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Hi fpmake devels,
fpmake uses as ppu output directory for example:
units/i386-linux/
And there is no way to change this. Right?
Some LCL packages have different PPUs per
Michael Van Canneyt schreef:
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Hi fpmake devels,
fpmake uses as ppu output directory for example:
units/i386-linux/
And there is no way to change this. Right?
Some LCL packages have different PPUs per widgetset, so they need an
output directory per
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Hi fpmake devels,
fpmake uses as ppu output directory for example:
units/i386-linux/
And there is no way to change this. Right?
Some LCL packages have different PPUs per widgetset, so they need an
output directory per widgetset. At the moment they
19 matches
Mail list logo
