leledumbo schreef:
For off line search, using the chm output and a chm viewer would be good
enough,
don't you think?
Yes, but I haven't seen the chm output in a while. Has it been able to
generate a TOC like the one I made (based on directory structure)?
I don't know if it is like the one
> For off line search, using the chm output and a chm viewer would be good
enough,
> don't you think?
Yes, but I haven't seen the chm output in a while. Has it been able to
generate a TOC like the one I made (based on directory structure)? You may
get it
http://www.esnips.com/doc/914356c7-2aa2-
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Vincent Snijders
wrote:
>
> For off line search, using the chm output and a chm viewer would be good
> enough, don't you think?
Umm, I haven't tried the new chm feature of fpdoc yet. I'll try this shortly. :)
Regards,
- Graeme -
leledumbo schreef:
How's the progress of adding search engine to fpdoc? Either Graeme's work
with Tipue and someone else's with Ioda.
For off line search, using the chm output and a chm viewer would be good enough,
don't you think?
Vincent
___
fpc-
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, leledumbo wrote:
>
> How's the progress of adding search engine to fpdoc? Either Graeme's work
> with Tipue and someone else's with Ioda.
There is none. I don't think tipue is a viable solution; Only ioda qualifies
IMHO.
Michael.
__
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 6:14 AM, leledumbo wrote:
>
> How's the progress of adding search engine to fpdoc? Either Graeme's work
> with Tipue and someone else's with Ioda.
I managed to get tiOPF's documentation searchable with Tipue, but with
anything as large as FPC's FCL or RTL it will not suff
