Re: [fpc-pascal] fpdoc and three packages

2006-11-29 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 11/29/06, Matt Emson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you've never looked at Instant Objects it is worthwhile. Far, far simpler to get in to than tiOPF. Only Win32 though AFAIAA. I have evaluated IO before v2 got released. Created quite a few prototype applications to try and reproduce my requ

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpdoc and three packages

2006-11-29 Thread Matt Emson
> Matt Emson wrote: > > > If you've never looked at Instant Objects it is worthwhile. Far, far simpler > > to get in to than tiOPF. Only Win32 though AFAIAA. > > And Kylix. Kylix 1? I have access to Kylix 1 developer (not the highest one, the middle one) but nothing newer bar the open ones. _

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpdoc and three packages

2006-11-29 Thread Joao Morais
Matt Emson wrote: If you've never looked at Instant Objects it is worthwhile. Far, far simpler to get in to than tiOPF. Only Win32 though AFAIAA. And Kylix. -- Joao Morais ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.fre

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpdoc and three packages

2006-11-29 Thread Matt Emson
> Delphi 5 support has been removed in tiOPF version 2, but version 1 is > still available on request. Anybody still using tiOPF v1 is highly > recommended to upgrade to tiOPF v2. No, I used v1. I looked at how much work a backport to D5 would be. Mostly it was routines missing from the Delphi RT

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpdoc and three packages

2006-11-29 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 11/29/06, Matt Emson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Cool.. and it works with Lazarus? I looked at tiOPF, but went with instant objects because it had better Delphi 5 support. Delphi 5 support has been removed in tiOPF version 2, but version 1 is still available on request. Anybody still using t

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpdoc and three packages

2006-11-29 Thread Matt Emson
> Yes, for a year now... > Been using it in a commercial application since January. Cool.. and it works with Lazarus? I looked at tiOPF, but went with instant objects becauuse it had better Delphi 5 support. tiOPF is cross platform too? M ___ fpc-pas

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpdoc and three packages

2006-11-29 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Yes, for a year now... Been using it in a commercial application since January. Graeme. On 11/29/06, Matt Emson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Graeme - sorry to be slightly off topic, but is tiOPF working with FPC now? ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpdoc and three packages

2006-11-29 Thread Matt Emson
Hi Graeme - sorry to be slightly off topic, but is tiOPF working with FPC now? ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpdoc and three packages

2006-11-29 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Thanks Michael! G. On 11/29/06, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Normally not. You should 1. Generate a .toc file (explained in the docs) 2. Reference a something in another package using #packagename.unit.identifier 3. Import the .toc file for the packages you refer to when gener

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpdoc and three packages

2006-11-29 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > Hi, > > I have 3 packages using fpdoc documentation in the tiOPF project. > Core, Options and GUI. I generate the html help as shown below. I have > 2 problems... > > 1) The index.html file gets overwritten with the last package when the > html h