> Tom Walsh schrieb:
> > Is there a compelling reason NOT to use GNU make for the fpc projects?
>
> Main problem: you can't express the cyclic interdependencies pascal
> units can have.
- Having to ship an external binary (or on *nix lay a dependancy).
- Expansion (more syntax/commands) mostly v
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Tom Walsh wrote:
>
>> I am starting work on one fpc project and planning another. The current
>> project will be for an x86 target, the planned project would be on ARM.
>> I'm
>> confused by the inclusion of a make utility within the fpc package.
>
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Tom Walsh wrote:
> I am starting work on one fpc project and planning another. The current
> project will be for an x86 target, the planned project would be on ARM. I'm
> confused by the inclusion of a make utility within the fpc package.
>
> Is there a compelling reason
Tom Walsh schrieb:
> Is there a compelling reason NOT to use GNU make for the fpc projects?
Main problem: you can't express the cyclic interdependencies pascal
units can have.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.free
