Re: [fpc-pascal] fcl-process, SimpleIPC and pipes

2013-10-08 Thread Juha Manninen
Thanks Michael and Mark for informative answers. Juha ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] fcl-process, SimpleIPC and pipes

2013-10-08 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Juha Manninen wrote: I must implement communication between 2 processes. I believe SimpleIPC is good for that purpose and it is well tested in a cross-platform system (Lazarus <-> ChmHelp). Named pipes were suggested to me. I would like to know the benefits / handicaps of SimpleIPC compared to n

Re: [fpc-pascal] fcl-process, SimpleIPC and pipes

2013-10-08 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Juha Manninen wrote: I must implement communication between 2 processes. I believe SimpleIPC is good for that purpose and it is well tested in a cross-platform system (Lazarus <-> ChmHelp). Named pipes were suggested to me. I would like to know the benefits / handicaps of