On 6/25/2012 05:12, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Sven Barth wrote:
Why does "COM-based + .NET-like metadata" imply that it's not native code?
The core libraries are written in either C or C++ and the metadata is
needed so that runtimes like .NET and languages like JavaS
On 25.06.2012 13:21, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Sven Barth wrote:
it as native. I guess it is faster than .NET code because it is not
managed. I thought that .NET allows non-managed code, too.
Why does "COM-based + .NET-like metadata" imply that it's not native
c
>>
>> A typelib importer is already in svn.
> Which won't be of much use for WinRT as this metadata is
> based on the metadata that .NET assemblies already use and not on IDL.
>From .net assemblies a TLB type library can be extracted with the regasm or
tlbexp .net tools. The typelib importer read
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Sven Barth wrote:
it as native. I guess it is faster than .NET code because it is not
managed. I thought that .NET allows non-managed code, too.
Why does "COM-based + .NET-like metadata" imply that it's not native
code?
The core libraries are written in either C or C++
Am 25.06.2012 11:48 schrieb "Marco van de Voort" :
>
> In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
> > > says that WinRT is a COM-based API and uses a .NET-like metadata
format.
> > > So it is not native code after all then. I don't know why they
advertised
> > it as native. I guess it is faster than
Am 25.06.2012 11:12 schrieb :
>
>
>
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Sven Barth wrote:
>
>> Am 24.06.2012 22:59 schrieb "Juha Manninen" :
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Sven Barth
>>
>> wrote:
I believe they'll mostly go through the WinRT, which is Microsoft's new
>>
>> API pet
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
> > says that WinRT is a COM-based API and uses a .NET-like metadata format.
> > So it is not native code after all then. I don't know why they advertised
> it as native. I guess it is faster than .NET code because it is not
> managed. I thought that .NET a
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 24.06.2012 22:59 schrieb "Juha Manninen" :
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Sven Barth
wrote:
I believe they'll mostly go through the WinRT, which is Microsoft's new
API pet project.
Thanks. I didn't even know about this WinRT. New technologi
Am 24.06.2012 22:59 schrieb "Juha Manninen" :
>
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Sven Barth
wrote:
>>
>> I believe they'll mostly go through the WinRT, which is Microsoft's new
API pet project.
>
>
> Thanks. I didn't even know about this WinRT. New technologies are
appearing all the time.
>
> Pa
> Page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_RunTime
> says that WinRT is a COM-based API and uses a .NET-like
> metadata format.
> So it is not native code after all then. I don't know why
> they advertised it as native. I guess it is faster than .NET
> code because it is not managed. I thought
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
> I believe they'll mostly go through the WinRT, which is Microsoft's new
> API pet project.
>
Thanks. I didn't even know about this WinRT. New technologies are appearing
all the time.
Page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_RunTime
says that
On 24.06.2012 15:39, Juha Manninen wrote:
*In a CNN news page
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/06/20/tech/mobile/windows-phone-8-microsoft/index.html
I found* that Windows Phone 8 will support native C code. That means it
will support also native pascal code.
Does anyone know how is it done in practic
12 matches
Mail list logo
