Am 07.05.2013 18:17, schrieb patspiper:
>
> Cross compiler building is broken for FPC 2.7.1 on Ubuntu and Fedora. I
> had submitted a couple of bug reports and made several posts in this
> mailing list, but all went unnoticed or were not handled. I have almost
> lost hope.
These reports are not a
On 07/05/13 09:33, Jonas Maebe wrote:
No, it goes: "nobody ever submitted a bug report about this nor posted anything on
the FPC mailing list and I don't use Windows myself, so this is the first I hear about
it". Problems need to be reported and fixed.
[...]
Every single person using the Mac
On 07 May 2013, at 13:15, Daniel Moore wrote:
I have not had bad experience with cross-compilers, as far as the
compilers not working as of yet. However, let me state for the
record, that a vast majority of the compiling that I will be doing
will be exclusively for 64-bit systems, and I s
On 5/6/2013 11:40 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
If I run 64-bit Mac or 64-bit Windows or 64-bit Linux, I want 64-bit
applications. Some OS's allow for easier execution of 32-bit apps, but
definitely not all. All my systems run 64-bit OS's, and all my
installed libraries etc are 64-bit too (thin
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
>
> And just to make it clear... it was NOT my idea to release my build of
> FPC 2.6.4 for 64-bit Windows. I was asked in private to archive what I
> have and make it available for download (on my own server). That is what
> I did.
It was the least
Am 06.05.2013 18:40, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
To put it simply, that is the reason I (and many others) need a 64-bit
FPC. I've had lots of bad experiences with FPC cross-compilers - from
installing headaches, to broken executables (don't ask me why, I don't
know why). So I simply don't trust FP
On 06 May 2013, at 18:40, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 2013-05-06 08:32, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>>
>> The whole point is that the "typical end user" doesn't know nor should
>> have to care about whether the compiler is a 32 or 64 bit binary. It
>> should not make any difference whatsoever.
>
>
On 2013-05-06 08:32, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> The whole point is that the "typical end user" doesn't know nor should
> have to care about whether the compiler is a 32 or 64 bit binary. It
> should not make any difference whatsoever.
How does the saying go: "I want to live in Theory, because eve
On 06 May 2013, at 21:15, Andrew Brunner wrote:
> On May 6, 2013, at 2:32 AM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
>>
>> On 04 May 2013, at 16:24, Andrew Brunner wrote:
>>
>>> I agree that most of us first go to x64 downloads for binaries. Thinking
>>> 32 to 64 or reverse is onerous on typical end users.
>
I agree with what you are saying as long as the os matches the binary type.
An x64 native package must install a x64bit binary and utils.
I would be understating if I said that a 32bit binary would be normal on a
64bit distro.
Andrew Brunner
Aurawin LLC
512.574.6298
A safe new way to sto
On 04 May 2013, at 16:24, Andrew Brunner wrote:
I agree that most of us first go to x64 downloads for binaries.
Thinking 32 to 64 or reverse is onerous on typical end users.
The whole point is that the "typical end user" doesn't know nor should
have to care about whether the compiler is a
In our previous episode, Andrew Brunner said:
> Guys, Graeme is well meaning here. I agree that most of us first go to x64
> downloads for binaries. Thinking 32 to 64 or reverse is onerous on typical
> end users.
>
> I need 64bit FPC binaries too. Presently I install the Lazarus to get
> 6
I wanted to mention that Lazarus comes with a 64bit FPC 2.6.2 from binaries...
Guys, Graeme is well meaning here. I agree that most of us first go to x64
downloads for binaries. Thinking 32 to 64 or reverse is onerous on typical end
users.
I need 64bit FPC binaries too. Presently I instal
On 03 May 2013, at 23:21, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> John Lee made the suggestion that an "unofficial" 64-bit Windows
> compiler archive be made available - for those people like me.
>
> You can now download it from the Free Pascal FTP site:
>
> ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/fpc/dist/2.6.2/x86_64-w
Hi,
John Lee made the suggestion that an "unofficial" 64-bit Windows
compiler archive be made available - for those people like me.
You can now download it from the Free Pascal FTP site:
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/fpc/dist/2.6.2/x86_64-win/
[ readme.txt ]--
64 bit win fpc 2
On 02 May 2013, at 11:07, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2013-05-02 09:43, Jonas Maebe wrote:
Lazarus and 64-bit FPC 2.6.0. I didn't want to read 10's of pages
on how to setup a cross compiler etc.
You don't have to read anything, it works exactly the same as a
regular compiler. Lazarus nor the
On 2013-05-02 09:43, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>> Lazarus and 64-bit FPC 2.6.0. I didn't want to read 10's of pages
>> on how to setup a cross compiler etc.
>
> You don't have to read anything, it works exactly the same as a
> regular compiler. Lazarus nor the compiler cares at all about what
> architect
On 02 May 2013, at 09:04, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 02/05/13 01:33, Joao Morais wrote:
>>
>> Why do you need a 64 bit compiler? (just curious)
>
> Huh? Because I was running 64-bit Windows 7, and needed to test and
> resolve a 64-bit bug. My system was already setup with 64-bit Lazarus
> an
On 02/05/13 01:33, Joao Morais wrote:
>
> Why do you need a 64 bit compiler? (just curious)
Huh? Because I was running 64-bit Windows 7, and needed to test and
resolve a 64-bit bug. My system was already setup with 64-bit Lazarus
and 64-bit FPC 2.6.0. I didn't want to read 10's of pages on how to
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
> In the end I just downloaded the FPC source, and built my own 64-bit
> compiler.
Why do you need a 64 bit compiler? (just curious)
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
htt
On 01/05/13 10:19, Gabor Boros wrote:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/freepascal/files/Win32/2.6.2/fpc-2.6.2.x86_64-win64.exe/download
That's what I thought too, but that is a 32-bit cross-compiler for
64-bit targets. I wanted a real 64-bit compiler.
In the end I just downloaded the FPC sou
On Wed, May 1, 2013 11:30, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> Am 30.04.2013 20:39, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just tried to update one of my Windows VM with the latest released
>> FPC. To my surprise there is no Win64 release for FPC 2.6.2 on
>> SourceForge? I only found a 32-bit cross-compile
Am 30.04.2013 20:39, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
> Hi,
>
> I just tried to update one of my Windows VM with the latest released
> FPC. To my surprise there is no Win64 release for FPC 2.6.2 on
> SourceForge? I only found a 32-bit cross-compiler.
>
> Why is this?
Because it has no advantage over t
2013.04.30. 20:39 keltezéssel, Graeme Geldenhuys írta:
Hi,
I just tried to update one of my Windows VM with the latest released
FPC. To my surprise there is no Win64 release for FPC 2.6.2 on
SourceForge? I only found a 32-bit cross-compiler.
Why is this?
Regards,
- Graeme -
http://sourc
24 matches
Mail list logo
