Tomas Hajny wrote:
What I was expecting is that the compilation fails in all cases.
Is there some flag that I failed to specify?
You can add {$X-} to the top (i.e. disable the so-called extended syntax
allowing to treat functions like procedures) and then it fails. However, I
think that it shoul
Gerhard Scholz wrote:
This must be read as follows:
function Tmp: Double;
begin
Result := 10; // there is a semicolon (mispelling?) [statement 1]
+ Element;[statement 2]
end;
So, Result becomes 10.
Yes, that's what happens and, yes it's a miss
On Thu, March 21, 2013 10:53, OBones wrote:
Hello,
> I'm using FPC 2.6.0 and have the following test program :
>
> program test;
>
> function Element: Double;
> begin
>Result := 4;
> end;
>
> function Tmp: Double;
> begin
>Result := 10; + Element;
> end;
>
> begin
>WriteLn(Tmp);
> en
This must be read as follows:
function Tmp: Double;
begin
Result := 10; // there is a semicolon (mispelling?) [statement 1]
+ Element;[statement 2]
end;
So, Result becomes 10.
The next line is a function call without storing the result. The lea
