leledumbo wrote:
Since it's possible to use libc's MM via cmem unit, would the opposite be
possible?
I have a "crtl.pas" which defines a few functions (malloc, calloc, free,
memmove, memcpy) to help in using libraries written in C with fpc
programs without needing external dependencies (msvcr
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008, Vinzent Höfler wrote:
> Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 31 Dec 2008, leledumbo wrote:
> >
> > > Since it's possible to use libc's MM via cmem unit, would the opposite be
> > > possible?
> >
> > > >From the point of view of FPC, there should not be a big problem
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008, leledumbo wrote:
Since it's possible to use libc's MM via cmem unit, would the opposite be
possible?
>From the point of view of FPC, there should not be a big problem.
The C library, this is another matter. I am not sure that it
supports plug
What if I replace libc's MM code with FPC one? Is it permitted?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Using-FPC-MM-in-a-C-program-tp21229445p21230388.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
fpc
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 31 Dec 2008, leledumbo wrote:
>
>>
>> Since it's possible to use libc's MM via cmem unit, would the opposite be
>> possible?
>
> >From the point of view of FPC, there should not be a big problem.
> The C library, this is ano
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008, leledumbo wrote:
>
> Since it's possible to use libc's MM via cmem unit, would the opposite be
> possible?
>From the point of view of FPC, there should not be a big problem.
The C library, this is another matter. I am not sure that it
supports plugging in a memory manager.
