list moderators)
Original Message
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Updated FPC from svn but make does not work..
From:"Mark Morgan Lloyd"
Date:Mon, November 23, 2015 09:32
To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Bo Berglund wrot
Bo Berglund wrote:
- Version control
We use CVS at our company since 14-15 years, so I installed cvsnt on
the RPi in order to use that against our company server. I had done
this on a Linux Mint 13 virtual machine earlier.
Problem: With the Pi I did not manage to set up the VPN connection to
the
On Monday 23 November 2015 06:13:43 Martin Schreiber wrote:
>
> It is probably possible to use git locally by an import of the CSV history
> https://git-scm.com/docs/gitcvs-migration
> and to fetch/push the changed files from/to the CSV server.
http://www.oak.homeunix.org/~marcel/blog/2009/06/03/t
On Sunday 22 November 2015 20:32:47 Bo Berglund wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 05:56:55 +0100, Martin Schreiber
>
> wrote:
> >And I strongly suggest to drop CVS and to use git
> >instead. ;-)
> >There is even a git client GUI written in Free Pascal:
> >http://sourceforge.net/projects/mseuniverse/
>
On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 05:56:55 +0100, Martin Schreiber
wrote:
>And I strongly suggest to drop CVS and to use git
>instead. ;-)
>There is even a git client GUI written in Free Pascal:
>http://sourceforge.net/projects/mseuniverse/
>
Not so easy, since the company version control uses CVS since many
On Saturday 21 November 2015 19:25:27 Bo Berglund wrote:
> >> On that we'll have to disagree. The RPi, particularly the 2, is an
> >> entirely adequate computer in its own right.
> >
> >Sure but the accustomed development environment (tools, documentation,
> > version control, useful links, mail a
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:12:49 +0100, Martin Schreiber
wrote:
>On Tuesday 10 November 2015 09:48:23 Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
>
>> >
>> > Yes. And I recommend to use cross compiling and debugging from a X86
>> > Linux PC:
>> > http://www.mail-archive.com/lazarus%40lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/msg504
Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Tuesday 10 November 2015 09:48:23 Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Yes. And I recommend to use cross compiling and debugging from a X86
Linux PC:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lazarus%40lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/msg504
06.html
On that we'll have to disagree. The RPi, partic
On Tuesday 10 November 2015 09:48:23 Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> >
> > Yes. And I recommend to use cross compiling and debugging from a X86
> > Linux PC:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/lazarus%40lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/msg504
> >06.html
>
> On that we'll have to disagree. The RPi, particularl
Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Monday 09 November 2015 23:57:30 Bo Berglund wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 15:19:12 +0100, Martin Schreiber
wrote:
On Monday 09 November 2015 11:35:05 Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
So. I'd suggest that you start off with Martin's binary, build the
matching 2.6.4,
FPC 2.6.4
On Monday 09 November 2015 23:57:30 Bo Berglund wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 15:19:12 +0100, Martin Schreiber
>
> wrote:
> >On Monday 09 November 2015 11:35:05 Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> >> So. I'd suggest that you start off with Martin's binary, build the
> >> matching 2.6.4,
> >
> >FPC 2.6.4 has
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 15:19:12 +0100, Martin Schreiber
wrote:
>On Monday 09 November 2015 11:35:05 Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
>>
>> So. I'd suggest that you start off with Martin's binary, build the
>> matching 2.6.4,
>
>FPC 2.6.4 has no support for EABIHF AFAIK. I have a patched 2.6.4 version with
On Monday 09 November 2015 11:35:05 Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
>
> So. I'd suggest that you start off with Martin's binary, build the
> matching 2.6.4,
FPC 2.6.4 has no support for EABIHF AFAIK. I have a patched 2.6.4 version with
EABIHF support but I suggest to use FPC 3.0 or fixes_3_0 instead.
I
Bo Berglund wrote:
On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 16:18:51 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
Bo Berglund wrote:
I think my 2.6.4 is OK because I got it as follows (from my notes):
wget
http://sourceforge.net/projects/freepascal/files/Linux/2.6.4/fpc-2.6.4.arm-linux.tar
tar xvf fpc-2.6.4.arm-linux.tar
cd f
On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 16:18:51 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
>Bo Berglund wrote:
>> I think my 2.6.4 is OK because I got it as follows (from my notes):
>> wget
>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/freepascal/files/Linux/2.6.4/fpc-2.6.4.arm-linux.tar
>> tar xvf fpc-2.6.4.arm-linux.tar
>> cd fpc-2.6.
Bo Berglund wrote:
On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 12:33:38 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
How am I supposed to update fpc 3.1.1?
You must always start with a released (currently 2.6.4) compiler. That
is normal.
To do this, you can e.g. make a symlink to the 2.6.4 compiler (name it
ppcarm-2.6.4) and
On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 12:33:38 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
>>> How am I supposed to update fpc 3.1.1?
>>
>> You must always start with a released (currently 2.6.4) compiler. That
>> is normal.
>>
>> To do this, you can e.g. make a symlink to the 2.6.4 compiler (name it
>> ppcarm-2.6.4) and
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sun, 8 Nov 2015, Bo Berglund wrote:
I have a trunk source tree for FPC, which I checked out a few weeks
ago and built fpc 3.1.1 using fpc 2.6.4 then installed it etc.
Now I wanted to get to the latest revision and did an svn update in
the source dir. But when I the
On Sun, 8 Nov 2015 12:14:10 +0100 (CET), Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
>> How am I supposed to update fpc 3.1.1?
>
>You must always start with a released (currently 2.6.4) compiler.
>That is normal.
>
>To do this, you can e.g. make a symlink to the 2.6.4 compiler
>(name it ppcarm-2.6.4) and use th
On Sun, 8 Nov 2015, Bo Berglund wrote:
I have a trunk source tree for FPC, which I checked out a few weeks
ago and built fpc 3.1.1 using fpc 2.6.4 then installed it etc.
Now I wanted to get to the latest revision and did an svn update in
the source dir. But when I then issue 'make all' I get t
On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 11:44:15 +0100, Bo Berglund
wrote:
>How am I supposed to update fpc 3.1.1?
Forgot to say that I am doing this on an ARM device (Raspberry Pi2).
--
Bo Berglund
Developer in Sweden
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.free
21 matches
Mail list logo
