On 2017-08-20 16:29, I previously wrote:
On 2017-08-10 22:45, Stuart Cox wrote:
Have a look at http://www.wolfgang-ehrhardt.de/
Thanks, looks interesting!
I could not find the maximum supported length of a number (multi
gigabyte?) or number string though..
i.e. for big numbers, but how big
On 2017-08-10 22:45, Stuart Cox wrote:
Have a look at http://www.wolfgang-ehrhardt.de/
Thanks, looks interesting!
I could not find the maximum supported length of a number (multi
gigabyte?) or number string though..
i.e. for big numbers, but how big? Big is a vague term :-)
It might be m
Have a look at http://www.wolfgang-ehrhardt.de/
On 2017-07-11 6:05 AM, nore...@z505.com wrote:
On 2017-07-07 17:08, Bart wrote:
On 7/7/17, nore...@z505.com wrote:
For integers beyond 64 bit, or even beyond 32 bit on a 64 bit machine,
why can't the math be broken down into peices the way a h
Here is another utility for really large numbers:
https://github.com/graemeg/freepascal/tree/master/packages/gmp
GMP (multi precision) bindings for fpc
This has been around for quite a while and should be well known - I
either forgot about it, or memory faded, or it didn't register in my
mind
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017, nore...@z505.com wrote:
On 2017-07-09 04:36, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Forwarded at request of fra...@rhost.it:
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017, nore...@z505.com wrote:
For integers beyond 64 bit, or even beyond 32 bit on a 64 bit machine,
why can't the math be broken do
On 2017-07-09 04:36, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Forwarded at request of fra...@rhost.it:
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017, nore...@z505.com wrote:
For integers beyond 64 bit, or even beyond 32 bit on a 64 bit machine,
why can't the math be broken down into peices the way a human does it
on paper,
On 2017-07-07 17:08, Bart wrote:
On 7/7/17, nore...@z505.com wrote:
For integers beyond 64 bit, or even beyond 32 bit on a 64 bit machine,
why can't the math be broken down into peices the way a human does it
on
paper, and then theoretically any number can be added and subtracted,
even if it
Forwarded at request of fra...@rhost.it:
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017, nore...@z505.com wrote:
For integers beyond 64 bit, or even beyond 32 bit on a 64 bit machine, why
can't the math be broken down into peices the way a human does it on paper,
and then theoretically any number can be added
Bart wrote:
On 7/7/17, nore...@z505.com wrote:
For integers beyond 64 bit, or even beyond 32 bit on a 64 bit machine,
why can't the math be broken down into peices the way a human does it on
paper, and then theoretically any number can be added and subtracted,
even if it is beyond 32/64 bit
On 7/7/17, nore...@z505.com wrote:
> For integers beyond 64 bit, or even beyond 32 bit on a 64 bit machine,
> why can't the math be broken down into peices the way a human does it on
> paper, and then theoretically any number can be added and subtracted,
> even if it is beyond 32/64 bit?
>
> Exam
10 matches
Mail list logo
