Re: [fpc-pascal] String theory

2016-05-10 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 10/05/16 17:48, Tony Whyman wrote: On 10/05/16 14:15, Bart wrote: It already is [part of the string type. See the StringCodePage function. > I don't think this is what I meant as StringCodePage is a unicode > string function. I am looking at the single byte string types. StringCodePage()

Re: [fpc-pascal] String theory

2016-05-10 Thread Jürgen Hestermann
Am 2016-05-10 um 17:48 schrieb Tony Whyman: I don't think this is what I meant as StringCodePage is a unicode string function. I am looking at the single byte string types. On 10/05/16 14:15, Bart wrote: It already is [part of the string type. See the StringCodePage function. Codepages a

Re: [fpc-pascal] String theory

2016-05-10 Thread Tony Whyman
I don't think this is what I meant as StringCodePage is a unicode string function. I am looking at the single byte string types. On 10/05/16 14:15, Bart wrote: It already is [part of the string type. See the StringCodePage function. ___ fpc-pascal m

Re: [fpc-pascal] String theory

2016-05-10 Thread Bart
On 5/10/16, Tony Whyman wrote: > .. Pascal could be improved by including (for string types) the code > page as part of the string data itself rather than having to infer it. It already is [part of the string type. See the StringCodePage function. Bart ___