On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
> On 04/01/2012 12:47, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>
> [i see I hit on the obvious so: cut]
>
>>
>> I agree with you! But I was discussing the possibility do not using
>> Exceptions. ;-) Another point is when and where uses Exceptions...
>> that's what
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
> On 04/01/2012 11:50, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>
>> Ok, I expressed myself poorly.
>> When I said: "If we could return more than one value, ok we (maybe) do
>> not need Exceptions."
>> I mean: "If we could return more than one value, using a better
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
>
> On 04/01/2012 00:31, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> [...]
> >> Another interesting article is:
> >> http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2003/10/13.html
> >
> > Very interesting and I agree when he say:
> > "I think the reason programmers in C/C++/Ja
