On 12/25/2011 09:22 AM, ik wrote:
>
> Even without the modified LGPL, you are wrong afaik. LGPL is about keeping
> the original code open, while allow you to do commercial work without
> releasing your own source. GPL is all about viral licensing. AFAIK the
> modified LGPL, claims that there will
On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 10:09, wrote:
> I wrote
> >
> > If you statically link the lgpl code into your EXE, your exe is the
> module
> > under lgpl now. Therefore all code must be released. Statically linked
> > lgpl code in an exe is not a dll that can be shipped separately.
>
> Nevermind, I see
