On 02 Apr 2013, at 11:11, Marc Weustink wrote:
On 28-3-2013 17:52, Jonas Maebe wrote:
+= does *not* prevent re-evaluating the left side. It is internally
translated to "x:=x+y" and then evaluated like normal. So if "x"
contains a function call with side effects, these side effects are
stil
On 28-3-2013 17:52, Jonas Maebe wrote:
+= does *not* prevent re-evaluating the left side. It is internally
translated to "x:=x+y" and then evaluated like normal. So if "x"
contains a function call with side effects, these side effects are still
triggered twice.
Is evaluated as x := x + y or a
On 28 Mar 2013, at 17:50, Benito van der Zander wrote:
>> What's the benefit?
> Same benefit as += to := ... +
>
> You do not need to rewrite/compute the left side
+= does *not* prevent re-evaluating the left side. It is internally translated
to "x:=x+y" and then evaluated like normal. So if "
What's the benefit?
Same benefit as += to := ... +
You do not need to rewrite/compute the left side
How will it affect existing code?
Not at all, since old code using this, would not compile
Last but not least, will you implement it?
I can try
On 03/28/2013 04:20 PM, leledumbo wrote:
Hmm..
