Re: [fpc-pascal] Range Check runtime errors

2020-12-09 Thread James Richters via fpc-pascal
> The suggestion was to make *your post* readable... > As it is it consists of just a mess of words on one gigantic line with no > structure and is very hard to read. > Does not invite one to help... A good and appreciated suggestion as well. I honestly did not even realize my post was like that

Re: [fpc-pascal] Range Check runtime errors

2020-12-08 Thread Bo Berglund via fpc-pascal
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 06:37:56 -0500, James Richters via fpc-pascal wrote: >Great idea! Thank you for the suggestion, that sould make it very easy to >track down. > >> Separate your big one line into a lot of lines like > >James > The suggestion was to make *your post* readable... As it is it con

Re: [fpc-pascal] Range Check runtime errors

2020-12-08 Thread James Richters via fpc-pascal
Great idea! Thank you for the suggestion, that sould make it very easy to track down. > Separate your big one line into a lot of lines like James ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailm

Re: [fpc-pascal] Range Check runtime errors

2020-12-08 Thread Winfried Bartnick via fpc-pascal
Am 07.12.20 um 21:28 schrieb James Richters via fpc-pascal: I was recently troubleshooting a program that got a range check error and had quite a time figuring it out... it gave me the line number that generated the error... but unfortunately that line had a whole pile variables in it... it