Thanks Pete,
Even though Micha did manage to explain why my demos ran as they did,
I will try you demo anyway. Purely to see how big the output file
grows. :-)
Quick recap from Micha. The time slicing in Linux is much larger that
under Windows. This improves performance (especially on
calcula
On Friday 29 September 2006 04:57, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>
> Below is a text (console) thread demo. The one thread counts from 0 to
> 1k and the other thread counts down from 1k to 0. Again, under Linux,
> one thread executes and teminates, then the next thread executes and
> terminates.
Greet
On 29/09/06, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I thought in your initial mail your were talking about having a console test app
with threads. Synchronize is harder then, because you have to call
CheckSynchronize
yourself.
Vincent.
Below is a text (console) thread demo. The one threa
My apologies Jason. I totally miss understood what you meant in your
first email! The second post explained it much better. Yeah, it's
Friday - my brain was already in weekend mode, but my body stuck at
the office. A terrible situation to be in. :-)
Regards,
- Graeme -
On 29/09/06, Jaso
Graeme Wrote:
>Thanks Jason - I don't recall you mentioning what platform you are working
>on, but I gather in is some *nix platform. The only thing you just proofed
>with your post is - threading is not working correctly!
>There shouldn't be a need for workarounds like suspending threads to get
Am Freitag, den 29.09.2006, 19:00 +0200 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
> Thanks Jason - I don't recall you mentioning what platform you are
> working on, but I gather in is some *nix platform. The only thing you
> just proofed with your post is - threading is not working correctly!
>
> There shouldn'
Thanks Jason - I don't recall you mentioning what platform you are
working on, but I gather in is some *nix platform. The only thing you
just proofed with your post is - threading is not working correctly!
There shouldn't be a need for workarounds like suspending threads to
get others to work. T
Some rambling observations:
> I was fighting the serial execution - and then I ran that little tiny test
> program - and it worked. I tried to fix my code some more - same problem -
> but the little test program worked... so I finally (this is what I mean
> when
> I say I resigned to design chang
On 29/09/06, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All gui stuff I run on windows. Non visual test apps, I can run on linux too.
If I really want I could do GUI in linux too, but I don't know too much about
gtk
and I rather spent time on improving things on the windows platform.
No prob
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
On 28/09/06, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know about this report:
http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=1906
Threading related, but not the same, as you are not using synchronize,
are you?
Vincent
Do you mean like below - which then means, I
What is also very interresting, which I thought I would share. I
added three more Bubble Sort columns to my test app (total of 6 sort
threads - knowing bubble sort is the slowest).
I then created all 6 threads suspended (t1 thru t6 in order). I then
resumed the threads in the order t1, t6, t2 t
On 28/09/06, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know about this report:
http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=1906
Threading related, but not the same, as you are not using synchronize,
are you?
Vincent
Do you mean like below - which then means, I do use synchronize. I
use
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Ok, I have tried this under Windows and Linux, with FPC 2.0.2, 2.0.4 and
2.1.1.
I have tested this on 4 different machines all with the same outcome.
Is any body else using threading in their applications? Are you
experiencing the same issues under Linux? If so, I wil
13 matches
Mail list logo
