On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:58:10 +0100
Reimar Grabowski wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:39:45 +0100
> Lukas Gradl wrote:
>
> > I'm not shure about that as I'm not that good at C. The packed record
> > works at 32bit -so I thought that should be correct.
> If it works on 32bit it should be correct.
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:39:45 +0100
Lukas Gradl wrote:
> I'm not shure about that as I'm not that good at C. The packed record
> works at 32bit -so I thought that should be correct.
If it works on 32bit it should be correct.
> Is there a difference between 64Bit and 32Bit?
Yes.
Some types have d
Jonas Maebe schrieb:
You must never use a "packed" record for a C record, unless it is
declared in C using __attribute__((__packed__)). The fact that it worked
in 32 bit was pure coincidence. You also have to add {$packrecords c} to
your source file to tell the compiler to lay out records the
On 18 Dec 2009, at 13:39, Lukas Gradl wrote:
> rMonitor=packed record
...
end;
rMonitorEx=packed record
dwMonitorSize:DWORD;
Monitor:rMonitor;
end;
Are you sure the C record is packed too ? This would mean that all
function pointers in rMonitor are not aligned.
I'm not shure ab
> rMonitor=packed record
...
end;
rMonitorEx=packed record
dwMonitorSize:DWORD;
Monitor:rMonitor;
end;
Are you sure the C record is packed too ? This would mean that all
function pointers in rMonitor are not aligned.
I'm not shure about that as I'm not that good at C. The p
Lukas Gradl wrote:
Hi!
I'm having serious troubles compiling a DLL for 64bit Windows.
I'm using FPC svn 1 (Ver 2.5.1) on all machines. I tried on WinXP
32bit (works), Vista 64bit (doesn't work), Win7 32Bit (works) and Win7
64bit (doesn't work).
> rMonitor=packed record
...
end;
r
