On 10 Jun 2010, at 12:13, Bihar Anwar wrote:
Thanks Jonas, your clarification strengthens my thought before. I
saw other several defects in MacOS SysUtils, just mention the
implementation of FindNext:
Result:=DoFind (Rslt); // whereas DoFind() is declared as a
procedure
How can that
June
10, 2010 3:03:45 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>"MacOS" in the RTL stands for "System 7.5 - Mac OS 9.2.x", i.e., the "classic
>Mac OS" which
preceded Mac OS X. I don't think the sysutils unit was ever completely ported
for that
platform.
Thanks Jonas, your clarification strengthens my thought
On 10 Jun 2010, at 06:29, Bihar Anwar wrote:
Also, I notice that SysUtils.GetLastOSError() in MacOS is defined
but it's implementation is empty. I've no knowledge on MacOS, so my
question is... Is this by designed?
"MacOS" in the RTL stands for "System 7.5 - Mac OS 9.2.x", i.e., the
"cla
On June
10, 2010 1:00:27 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>... or whether it should return the last OS error for what OS function
invoked recently (also directly without using RTL).
Yes, I think this one is agreed with other similar RTL functions.
__
On Thu, June 10, 2010 06:29, Bihar Anwar wrote:
> I don't see SysUtils.GetLastOSError() in DOS. Looking at a glance, I think
> it will be a trivial effort by just returning Dos.DosError variable
> content.
Thanks for the notification, I'll have a look at it (creating a bug report
to make sure it i
