On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd <
markmll.fpc-pas...@telemetry.co.uk> wrote:
> Sven Barth wrote:
>
>> Am 19.04.2013 14:05, schrieb Sven Barth:
>>
>>> Am 19.04.2013 14:02, schrieb Reimar Grabowski:
>>>
Hi,
I have read the discussions about FPC using LLVM and the re
Sven Barth wrote:
Am 19.04.2013 14:05, schrieb Sven Barth:
Am 19.04.2013 14:02, schrieb Reimar Grabowski:
Hi,
I have read the discussions about FPC using LLVM and the reasons
against it (which I fully understand and support). But a friend of mine
called my attention to this: https://github.c
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:06:44 +0200
Sven Barth wrote:
> > If you would have read the discussion about LLVM you would know that
> > emscripten was the reason that it was brought up the last time... ;)
> Sorry, it should be "Since you have read ... you should know ..."
It should be "If I had read
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:06:38 +0300
Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
> Actually, I think you can write an asm.js code generator for FPC. Going
> through LLVM isn't necessary.
Will look into it ASAP. This would be great.
R.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@
Am 19.04.2013 14:05, schrieb Sven Barth:
Am 19.04.2013 14:02, schrieb Reimar Grabowski:
Hi,
I have read the discussions about FPC using LLVM and the reasons
against it (which I fully understand and support). But a friend of mine
called my attention to this: https://github.com/kripken/emscript
On 04/19/2013 03:02 PM, Reimar Grabowski wrote:
Hi,
I have read the discussions about FPC using LLVM and the reasons against it
(which I fully understand and support). But a friend of mine
called my attention to this: https://github.com/kripken/emscripten/wiki
From what I have seen this is qu
