On Mon, May 7, 2012 14:26, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Mon, 7 May 2012 13:34:50 +0200 (CEST) "Tomas Hajny"
wrote:
>> 54 lines for WinXX, 144 for OS/2 and 278 for GO32v2 (all without the
>> additional platform specific implementation for changing the passed
>> environment).
>
> Where do got those
In our previous episode, Mattias Gaertner said:
> It's not big. The RTL lacks little functions for scripts. For
> example download an URL, get a list of files in a directory, load a
> xml file, test a RE.
>
> Running pascal programs as scripts is only the first step. The
> next step is to provide
On Mon, 7 May 2012 13:34:50 +0200 (CEST)
"Tomas Hajny" wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 12:21, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 May 2012 15:04:05 +0200 (CEST)
> > "Tomas Hajny" wrote:
>[...]
> > The implementation for unix is only a few lines.
> > I guess for winxx and os/2 too.
>
> 54 lines f
On Mon, May 7, 2012 12:21, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Sat, 5 May 2012 15:04:05 +0200 (CEST)
> "Tomas Hajny" wrote:
>> On Sat, May 5, 2012 14:13, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
.
.
>> > ExecuteProcess is only a simple utility function.
>> > All posix platforms can start a process with another
>> > env
On Sat, 5 May 2012 15:04:05 +0200 (CEST)
"Tomas Hajny" wrote:
> On Sat, May 5, 2012 14:13, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 May 2012 14:02:12 +0200 (CEST)
> > "Tomas Hajny" wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 5, 2012 09:22, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 4 May 2012, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>
On Sat, 5 May 2012 17:43:44 +0200
Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 05 May 2012, at 14:25, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>
> > It uses only the file name, not the path to distinguish.
> > Having two scripts with the same name recompiles every time you
> > switch.
>
> This does mean that if a script is moved
On 05 May 2012, at 14:25, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> It uses only the file name, not the path to distinguish.
> Having two scripts with the same name recompiles every time you
> switch.
This does mean that if a script is moved, the stored script location as seen by
the compiled binary will not c
On 5 May 12, at 14:20, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Sat, 5 May 2012 14:07:01 +0200 (CEST)
> "Tomas Hajny" wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 4, 2012 21:58, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > > In our previous episode, Tomas Hajny said:
> > >> 1) Find the first alphabetic character after the first line (which is
On Sat, May 5, 2012 14:08, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 05 May 2012, at 14:02, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>
>> My proposal is platform independent (i.e. it will work also under Win32,
>> OS/2, etc., without any changes). Your proposal probably requires
>> starting
>> the compiled binary using platform specific
On Sat, May 5, 2012 14:13, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Sat, 5 May 2012 14:02:12 +0200 (CEST)
> "Tomas Hajny" wrote:
>> On Sat, May 5, 2012 09:22, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>> > On Fri, 4 May 2012, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 04 May 2012 17:22:16 +0200
>> >> dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wro
On Sat, 5 May 2012 14:08:26 +0200
Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 05 May 2012, at 14:02, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>
> > My proposal is platform independent (i.e. it will work also under Win32,
> > OS/2, etc., without any changes). Your proposal probably requires starting
> > the compiled binary using platf
On Sat, 5 May 2012 14:07:01 +0200 (CEST)
"Tomas Hajny" wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 21:58, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > In our previous episode, Tomas Hajny said:
> >> 1) Find the first alphabetic character after the first line (which is
> >> already processed/skipped by InstantFPC anyway) while
On Sat, 5 May 2012 14:02:12 +0200 (CEST)
"Tomas Hajny" wrote:
> On Sat, May 5, 2012 09:22, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 May 2012, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> >> On Fri, 04 May 2012 17:22:16 +0200
> >> dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I'm creating a script to be exe
On 05 May 2012, at 14:02, Tomas Hajny wrote:
> My proposal is platform independent (i.e. it will work also under Win32,
> OS/2, etc., without any changes). Your proposal probably requires starting
> the compiled binary using platform specific API functions to run it with a
> modified environment
On Fri, May 4, 2012 21:58, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> In our previous episode, Tomas Hajny said:
>> 1) Find the first alphabetic character after the first line (which is
>> already processed/skipped by InstantFPC anyway) while ignoring all
>> whitespaces and possible comments (in all allowed forma
On Sat, May 5, 2012 09:22, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Fri, 4 May 2012, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>> On Fri, 04 May 2012 17:22:16 +0200
>> dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm creating a script to be executed by instantfpc when I noticed
>>> that paramstr(0) does not reflect the loc
On Fri, 4 May 2012, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Fri, 04 May 2012 17:22:16 +0200
dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
I'm creating a script to be executed by instantfpc when I noticed
that paramstr(0) does not reflect the location of the script but the
location of the cached executable. Is there
On Fri, 04 May 2012 17:22:16 +0200
dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
>
>
> I'm creating a script to be executed by instantfpc when I noticed
> that paramstr(0) does not reflect the location of the script but the
> location of the cached executable. Is there a way to alter this location
> program
In our previous episode, Tomas Hajny said:
> 1) Find the first alphabetic character after the first line (which is
> already processed/skipped by InstantFPC anyway) while ignoring all
> whitespaces and possible comments (in all allowed formats, i.e. including
> (* *) ) - the only small complexity h
On Fri, May 4, 2012 18:44, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
> On May 4, 2012, at 6:12 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 17:44, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
>>> On 4 mei '12, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Fri, 4 May
>>> 2012, michael.vancann...@wisa.be [3]wrote:
> On Fri, 4
On May 4, 2012, at 6:12 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 17:44, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
>> On 4 mei '12, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
>>> On Fri, 4 May
>> 2012, michael.vancann...@wisa.be [3]wrote:
>>>
On Fri, 4 May 2012,
>> dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl [1]wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 17:44, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
> On 4 mei '12, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
>> On Fri, 4 May
> 2012, michael.vancann...@wisa.be [3]wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 4 May 2012,
> dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl [1]wrote:
>>>
I'm creating a script to be
> executed by instantfpc wh
On 4 mei '12, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
> On Fri, 4 May
2012, michael.vancann...@wisa.be [3]wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 4 May 2012,
dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl [1]wrote:
>>
>>> I'm creating a script to be
executed by instantfpc when I noticed that paramstr(0) does not reflect
the location of
On Fri, 4 May 2012, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2012, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
I'm creating a script to be executed by instantfpc when I noticed
that paramstr(0) does not reflect the location of the script but the
location of the cached executable. Is there a w
On Fri, 4 May 2012, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
I'm creating a script to be executed by instantfpc when I noticed
that paramstr(0) does not reflect the location of the script but the
location of the cached executable. Is there a way to alter this location
programatically to the script lo
25 matches
Mail list logo
