Martin Schreiber wrote:
In my Raspbian RPi 1 model B rev2 I installed FPC 2.6.0 by
apt-get install fpc
Then I extracted fpc_eabihf_3_0_1.tar.gz to /home/pi/fpc.
cd to the svn fixes_3_0 checkout,
"
make PP=/home/pi/fpc/3_0/eabihf/lib/fpc/3.0.1/ppcarm OVERRIDEVERSIONCHECK=1
all
"
Thought a st
On 09/07/2015 08:24 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Below on Raspbian 2015-05-05:
..
make[3]: Leaving directory '/usr/local/src/fpc/fixes_3_0/packages/fpmkunit'
/usr/local/src/fpc/fixes_3_0/compiler/ppcarm fpmake.pp
-Fu/usr/local/src/fpc/fixes_3_0/packages/fpmkunit/units_bs/arm-linux
-Fu/usr/local
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Saturday 05 September 2015 19:55:38 Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Martin Schreiber wrote:
Starting over, I get to
Free Pascal Compiler version 3.0.1 [2015/08/29] for arm
Copyright (c) 1993-2015 by Florian Klaempfl and others
Target OS: Linux fo
Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Saturday 05 September 2015 19:55:38 Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Martin Schreiber wrote:
Starting over, I get to
Free Pascal Compiler version 3.0.1 [2015/08/29] for arm
Copyright (c) 1993-2015 by Florian Klaempfl and others
Target OS: Linux for ARMHF
Compiling fpmake.p
On Saturday 05 September 2015 19:55:38 Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> > Martin Schreiber wrote:
> >
> > Starting over, I get to
> >
> > Free Pascal Compiler version 3.0.1 [2015/08/29] for arm
> > Copyright (c) 1993-2015 by Florian Klaempfl and others
> > Target OS: Linux for ARMHF
> > Compiling fpmak
> Martin Schreiber wrote:
>
> Starting over, I get to
>
> Free Pascal Compiler version 3.0.1 [2015/08/29] for arm
> Copyright (c) 1993-2015 by Florian Klaempfl and others
> Target OS: Linux for ARMHF
> Compiling fpmake.pp
Can you send the lines before these lines? I'm interested in how the
fpma
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
The good news is that after successful tests on x86 and x86-64 Linux
(Debian Jessie), yesterday evening I was able to compile and run Lazarus
1.4 using FPC 3.0.1 on a SPARC running OpenSXCE (very approximately,
Solaris 11).
Also OK on PPC Mac running Linux.
The bad
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Anyway, even with that older Rasbian release FPC 3.0.1 is now making a
valiant attempt to compile Lazarus. Whichever way that goes I'll discuss
it in the Lazarus mailing list.
Just in case this is something that anybody thinks is worth discussing:
The good news is th
Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Monday 31 August 2015 16:25:38 Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
As I've said already- more than once-
I wrote the previous mail "for the benefit of
anybody getting here via Google" too. ;-)
Sorry for annoying you.
[GRIN] Nonono, I'm not annoyed. But particularly taking i
On Monday 31 August 2015 16:25:38 Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
>
> As I've said already- more than once-
I wrote the previous mail "for the benefit of
anybody getting here via Google" too. ;-)
Sorry for annoying you.
Martin
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc
Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Monday 31 August 2015 13:00:59 Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Thanks Jonas, that fixes it. To wrap this up and for the benefit of
anybody getting here via Google: this is for a Raspeberry Pi with
2014-era Raspbian.
Binaries from: http://sourceforge.net/projects/mseide-mseg
On Monday 31 August 2015 13:00:59 Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Thanks Jonas, that fixes it. To wrap this up and for the benefit of
> anybody getting here via Google: this is for a Raspeberry Pi with
> 2014-era Raspbian.
>
> Binaries from: http://sourceforge.net/projects/mseide-msegui/files/fpcarm/
>
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Jonas Maebe wrote:
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I've already got both in the fpc.cfg file:
# path to the gcclib
-Fl/usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.6.3
-Fl/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi
"make all" in the top level directory ignores your fpc.cfg (by design).
[Slaps forehead
Jonas Maebe wrote:
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I've already got both in the fpc.cfg file:
# path to the gcclib
-Fl/usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.6.3
-Fl/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi
"make all" in the top level directory ignores your fpc.cfg (by design).
[Slaps forehead] I'll be back.
--
Mark M
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I've already got both in the fpc.cfg file:
# path to the gcclib
-Fl/usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.6.3
-Fl/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi
"make all" in the top level directory ignores your fpc.cfg (by design).
Jonas
___
fpc-pas
Jonas Maebe wrote:
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
/usr/local/src/fpc/fixes_3_0/rtl/units/arm-linux/cprt0.o: In function
`_haltproc_eabi':
(.text+0x88): undefined reference to `_fini'
/usr/local/src/fpc/fixes_3_0/rtl/units/arm-linux/cprt0.o: In function
`_haltproc_eabi':
(.text+0x90): undefined referen
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
/usr/local/src/fpc/fixes_3_0/rtl/units/arm-linux/cprt0.o: In function
`_haltproc_eabi':
(.text+0x88): undefined reference to `_fini'
/usr/local/src/fpc/fixes_3_0/rtl/units/arm-linux/cprt0.o: In function
`_haltproc_eabi':
(.text+0x90): undefined reference to `_init'
chmcmd
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 30/08/15 17:36, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
[Requesting program interpreter: /lib/ld-linux.so.3]
..
$ ls -l /lib/ld-linux.so.3
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 28 Oct 16 2014 /lib/ld-linux.so.3 ->
arm-linux-gnueabi/ld-2.13.so
$ ls -l /lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/ld-2.13.so
-rwxr-xr-x
On 30/08/15 17:36, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> [Requesting program interpreter: /lib/ld-linux.so.3]
> ..
>
> $ ls -l /lib/ld-linux.so.3
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 28 Oct 16 2014 /lib/ld-linux.so.3 ->
> arm-linux-gnueabi/ld-2.13.so
>
> $ ls -l /lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/ld-2.13.so
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 r
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 30/08/15 15:35, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
..
[Requesting program interpreter: /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3]
..
That file's missing, something's obviously badly wrong with the Rpi
filesystem etc.: I strongly suspect that somebody did an incautious
update/upgrade/dist-upgra
On Sunday 30 August 2015 14:11:17 John Lee wrote:
> Not clear about rpi compilers for rc1. My testing on rpi 2 of Martin's
> 3.0.0 of 18th Aug (similar to rc1?) suggests that compilation works ok, but
> linking doesn't.
>
What means "but linking doesn't"? the
"/usr/bin/ld: warning: link.res contai
On 30/08/15 15:35, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> ..
> [Requesting program interpreter: /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3]
> ..
>
> That file's missing, something's obviously badly wrong with the Rpi
> filesystem etc.: I strongly suspect that somebody did an incautious
> update/upgrade/dist-upgrade.
Wha
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 29/08/15 17:57, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
./fpmake compile --localunitdir=.. --os=linux --cpu=arm -o -Ur -o -Xs -o
-O2 -o -n -o -Fu/usr/local/src/fpc/fixes_3_0/rtl/units/arm-linux -o
-V3.0.1 -o -O- -o -gl -o -Xs- -o -vt -o -darm -o -dRELEASE
--compiler=/usr/local/src/fpc/fix
On 30/08/15 14:47, John Lee wrote:
> Can you please tell me which packages are needed so linking works. Martin?
What linker error did you get? You only posted "/usr/bin/ld: warning:
link.res contains output sections; did you forget -T?", but as the
message literally says that's a warning, not an
Can you please tell me which packages are needed so linking works. Martin?
Don't understand your point(s) - it is complicated by the problems of arm
on 2.6.4 and the arm flavours, but you seem to be making it worse! We
support fpc on various win (and linux) os for i386 & various versions, eg
win x
On 29/08/15 17:57, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> ./fpmake compile --localunitdir=.. --os=linux --cpu=arm -o -Ur -o -Xs -o
> -O2 -o -n -o -Fu/usr/local/src/fpc/fixes_3_0/rtl/units/arm-linux -o
> -V3.0.1 -o -O- -o -gl -o -Xs- -o -vt -o -darm -o -dRELEASE
> --compiler=/usr/local/src/fpc/fixes_3_0/compile
On 30/08/15 14:11, John Lee wrote:
> Not clear about rpi compilers for rc1. My testing on rpi 2 of Martin's
> 3.0.0 of 18th Aug (similar to rc1?) suggests that compilation works ok,
> but linking doesn't.
Maybe you don't have the correct extra packages installed.
> So does this mean that 3.0.0 d
Not clear about rpi compilers for rc1. My testing on rpi 2 of Martin's
3.0.0 of 18th Aug (similar to rc1?) suggests that compilation works ok, but
linking doesn't.
So does this mean that 3.0.0 doesn't have a working fpc for rpi 2?
What about rpi 1?
I have both rpi 1 and 2 available, so let me kno
On 29/08/15 19:48, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> Nevertheless, it does not explain why the OPT=-dFPC_ARMHF is needed.
It is not necessary, I had simply (wrongly) made that deduction from
looking all over the compiler source code (except for in fpcdefs.inc)
and checking where it would automatically set
On 29/08/15 20:50, John Lee wrote:
> What is fix please? I noticed Jonas committed a link patch to svn today.
> Does that fix it?
No.
Jonas
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi
On Saturday 29 August 2015 20:05:35 John Lee wrote:
>
> /usr/bin/ld: warning: link.res contains output sections; did you forget -T?
This is normal.
Martin
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/ma
Am 27.08.2015 um 02:08 schrieb Ched:
> Hello,
>
> I strongly discourage the use of {$optimization deadstore} which induced
> strong numerical errors on our solar system calculations (i386 linux).
> The other new ones
>{$optimization deadvalues}
>{$optimization orderfields}
>{$optimizat
Am 29.08.2015 um 14:54 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
> On 29/08/15 14:49, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
>> Am 29. August 2015 1:58:06 nachm. schrieb Jonas Maebe
>> :
>>
>>> On 29/08/15 13:40, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 29. August 2015 12:00:26 nachm. schrieb Jonas Maebe
:
>
> In any case: you shou
Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Saturday 29 August 2015 15:38:35 Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Martin, what would be really useful is knowing /exactly/ what sources
you used to build your binary at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mseide-msegui/files/fpcarm/
"
svn info
Path: .
Working Copy Root Path: /ho
On 29/08/15 17:30, John Lee wrote:
> If I cd to eabihf/lib/fpc/3.0.1 there is ppcarm of 14th Aug there but
> running ppcarm still gives 2.6.4!
On Unix-like platforms, you have to use "./ppcarm" to execute the ppcarm
binary in the current directory instead of the one in the PATH. The
reason is tha
Dohhh, still getting 2.6.4.
Did you mean ppcarm?
Downloaded fpc_eabihf_3_0_1.tar.gz, extracted
If I cd to eabihf/lib/fpc/3.0.1 there is ppcarm of 14th Aug there but
running ppcarm still gives 2.6.4!
Or should I do exec ppcarm?
John
On 29 August 2015 at 12:52, Martin Schreiber
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 29/08/15 11:55, Martin Schreiber wrote:
"
make PP=/home/pi/fpc/3_0/eabihf/lib/fpc/3.0.1/ppcarm OVERRIDEVERSIONCHECK=1
all
"
in a fixes_3_0 checkout works for me.
Note that Mark is building 3.0.0rc1, not fixes_3_0. Building an older
revision with a compiler built from a
On 29/08/15 14:49, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> Am 29. August 2015 1:58:06 nachm. schrieb Jonas Maebe
> :
>
>> On 29/08/15 13:40, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
>>> Am 29. August 2015 12:00:26 nachm. schrieb Jonas Maebe
>>> :
In any case: you should have to pass OPT="-dFPC_ARMHF" to get an armhf
>>>
Am 29. August 2015 1:58:06 nachm. schrieb Jonas Maebe
:
> On 29/08/15 13:40, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
>> Am 29. August 2015 12:00:26 nachm. schrieb Jonas Maebe
>> :
>>>
>>> In any case: you should have to pass OPT="-dFPC_ARMHF" to get an armhf
>>> compiler (even if you already start with an armhf co
On 29/08/15 13:40, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> Am 29. August 2015 12:00:26 nachm. schrieb Jonas Maebe
> :
>>
>> In any case: you should have to pass OPT="-dFPC_ARMHF" to get an armhf
>> compiler (even if you already start with an armhf compiler).
>
> This should not be necessary?
I also used to thin
On Saturday 29 August 2015 13:32:57 John Lee wrote:
> Just downloaded the non debug version onto my rpi 2. Extracted - 6 files in
> /bin, including fpc but it is 2.6.4 not 3.0. Any ideas?
Try to start
"
/eabihf/lib/fpc/3.0.1/ppcrossarm
"
directly. /bin/fpc probably picks the wrong compiler.
Marti
Am 29. August 2015 12:00:26 nachm. schrieb Jonas Maebe
:
>
> In any case: you should have to pass OPT="-dFPC_ARMHF" to get an armhf
> compiler (even if you already start with an armhf compiler).
This should not be necessary?
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
Just downloaded the non debug version onto my rpi 2. Extracted - 6 files in
/bin, including fpc but it is 2.6.4 not 3.0. Any ideas? Is there a rc1 .gz
anywhere?
John
On 29 August 2015 at 10:55, Martin Schreiber wrote:
> On Friday 28 August 2015 10:30:24 Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> > Martin Schre
On 29/08/15 11:55, Martin Schreiber wrote:
> "
> make PP=/home/pi/fpc/3_0/eabihf/lib/fpc/3.0.1/ppcarm OVERRIDEVERSIONCHECK=1
> all
> "
> in a fixes_3_0 checkout works for me.
Note that Mark is building 3.0.0rc1, not fixes_3_0. Building an older
revision with a compiler built from a newer revision
On Friday 28 August 2015 10:30:24 Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Martin Schreiber wrote:
> > On Wednesday 26 August 2015 20:14:09 Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> >> Is there a native ARM version compatible with the Raspberry Pi?
> >
> > Here:
> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mseide-msegui/files/fpcarm/
>
Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Wednesday 26 August 2015 20:14:09 Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Is there a native ARM version compatible with the Raspberry Pi?
Here:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mseide-msegui/files/fpcarm/
Please run eabihf/lib/fpc/3.0.1/samplecfg in order to create a default
confi
Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Wednesday 26 August 2015 20:14:09 Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Is there a native ARM version compatible with the Raspberry Pi?
Here:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mseide-msegui/files/fpcarm/
Please run eabihf/lib/fpc/3.0.1/samplecfg in order to create a default
confi
On Wednesday 26 August 2015 20:14:09 Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
>
> Is there a native ARM version compatible with the Raspberry Pi?
Here:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mseide-msegui/files/fpcarm/
Please run eabihf/lib/fpc/3.0.1/samplecfg in order to create a default
configuration file.
Cross de
Hello,
I strongly discourage the use of {$optimization deadstore} which induced strong numerical errors on our
solar system calculations (i386 linux). The other new ones
{$optimization deadvalues}
{$optimization orderfields}
{$optimization fastmath}
{$optimization constprop}
seem to
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Hello
We have placed the first release candidate of the Free Pascal Compiler
version 3.0.0 on our ftp servers.
You can help improve the upcoming 3.0.0 release by downloading and
testing this release. If you want you can report what you have done here:
http://wiki.free
50 matches
Mail list logo
