On 26 Sep 2012, at 07:58, Vincent Snijders wrote:
> 2012/9/25 Bernd :
>> 2012/9/25 patspiper :
>>> procedure test;
>>> begin
>>> Move(MyClass1.Ref.Data^, MyClass2.Ref.Data^, 1);
>>> end;
>>
>> and if you cast it to some other pointer type before dereferencing the
>> error goes away:
>>
>> proc
On 26/09/12 08:58, Vincent Snijders wrote:
2012/9/25 Bernd:
2012/9/25 patspiper:
procedure test;
begin
Move(MyClass1.Ref.Data^, MyClass2.Ref.Data^, 1);
end;
and if you cast it to some other pointer type before dereferencing the
error goes away:
procedure test;
begin
Move(MyClass1.Ref.Da
2012/9/25 Bernd :
> 2012/9/25 patspiper :
>> procedure test;
>> begin
>> Move(MyClass1.Ref.Data^, MyClass2.Ref.Data^, 1);
>> end;
>
> and if you cast it to some other pointer type before dereferencing the
> error goes away:
>
> procedure test;
> begin
> Move(MyClass1.Ref.Data^, PByte(MyClass2.R
On 25/09/12 20:43, Bernd wrote:
2012/9/25 patspiper :
procedure test;
begin
Move(MyClass1.Ref.Data^, MyClass2.Ref.Data^, 1);
end;
and if you cast it to some other pointer type before dereferencing the
error goes away:
procedure test;
begin
Move(MyClass1.Ref.Data^, PByte(MyClass2.Ref.Data
2012/9/25 patspiper :
> procedure test;
> begin
> Move(MyClass1.Ref.Data^, MyClass2.Ref.Data^, 1);
> end;
and if you cast it to some other pointer type before dereferencing the
error goes away:
procedure test;
begin
Move(MyClass1.Ref.Data^, PByte(MyClass2.Ref.Data)^, 1);
end;
But this should
2012/9/25 patspiper :
> Hi,
>
> Despite
> http://wiki.freepascal.org/User_Changes_2.4.0#Treating_direct-mapped_properties_as_regular_fields,
> shouldn't the following be legal? I tested under FPC 2.6.1 and 2.7.1.
This shouldn't even matter here since IMHO it should work even if Ref
were a function
On 21 Feb 2011, at 16:59, Roland Turcan wrote:
> type TMyObj = class
> private
>MyPWord:PWord;
>...
> end;
>
> procedure TMyObj.Some;
> begin
> ...
> Inc (Cardinal (MyPWord), 2);
> ...
> end;
>
> and compiler says %subj%
>
> This cod
