Re: [fpc-pascal] Compiling library / Win32 DLL

2005-12-29 Thread L505
>i had started doing development using the FP console IDE. > >i then "discovered" Lazarus, and wanting to be able to use a GUI IDE, > >i downloaded and installed it. > >i then took the exact same code, compiled it, which produced a DLL for >me, and when i tried to get my hosting application to l

Re: [fpc-pascal] Compiling library / Win32 DLL

2005-12-29 Thread Tony Pelton
On 12/29/05, chromdildo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for your reply. > > Whats the difference, when compiling without Lazarus? i don't know. i just wanted to mention it, in case it was relevant. i had started doing development using the FP console IDE. i then "discovered" Lazarus, and wa

Re: [fpc-pascal] Compiling library / Win32 DLL

2005-12-29 Thread chromdildo
Thanks for your reply. Whats the difference, when compiling without Lazarus? The library relys on the LCL (for GUI) and compiling from commandline results in exactly the same (non working) dll. Where can I learn more about the structures, calling conventions, etc used by freepascal/Lazarus vs. Del

Re: [fpc-pascal] Compiling library / Win32 DLL

2005-12-29 Thread Tony Pelton
you are using FP or its IDE and _not_ lazarus ... right ? i had some troubles with building a DLL with lazarus, where identical code would build link under lazarus, and my windows application wouldn't load it, and everything would work fine when i built it using the FP compiler standalone. likely

Re: [fpc-pascal] Compiling library / Win32 DLL

2005-12-29 Thread Иван Шихалев
> Same code compiles and runs fine with Delphi. May be a troubles with export names. It is needed to define export names explicite in "exports" clause. ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listin