On 04 Apr 2009, at 21:47, ik wrote:
I can't reproduce it with a stand alone test (made many attempts).
I can however place my original unit, because it is a LGPL unit I'm
creating
in the bug report, and see what is wrong there.
Will it be ok to do that in the bug report ?
As long as you at
Jonas,
I can't reproduce it with a stand alone test (made many attempts).
I can however place my original unit, because it is a LGPL unit I'm creating
in the bug report, and see what is wrong there.
Will it be ok to do that in the bug report ?
Thanks,
Ido
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Jonas
Hello ik,
Saturday, April 4, 2009, 3:07:58 PM, you wrote:
i> SetLength(Prefix, High(aPrefix));
i> SetLength(NumberLength, High(aNumberLength));
Discarding the compiler crash, this code seems buggy to me, unless you
know exactly the high/low of the arrays matches its length, I think it
On 04 Apr 2009, at 15:07, ik wrote:
Am I doing here something wrong (I think I can do better with coping
between
open and dynamic array) ?
An unhandled exception in the compiler is always a compiler bug.
Please submit a bug report with a compilable example that demonstrates
the problem.
