>> What about the generic containers? I guess it has not been planned yet.
> There are some in the fgl unit in the RTL. As far as I can see, they are
> not yet documented.
I've used it in some occasions and it works very well (except for that
ifdef-ed Assign method, that also affects recursive
Juha Manninen schreef:
What about the generic containers? I guess it has not been planned yet.
There are some in the fgl unit in the RTL. As far as I can see, they are
not yet documented.
Vincent
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepa
On sunnuntai, 29. marraskuuta 2009 21:27:39 Vincent Snijders wrote:
> Juha Manninen schreef:
> > Uhh...
> >
> > Is the class TFPStringHashTable (and TFPCustomHashTable) actually doing a
> > hashmap?
> > The ported JCL StringHashMap is duplicate effort then after all.
>
> Here is the docs:
> http:/
Juha Manninen schreef:
Uhh...
Is the class TFPStringHashTable (and TFPCustomHashTable) actually doing a
hashmap?
The ported JCL StringHashMap is duplicate effort then after all.
Here is the docs:
http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/fpcdoc/fcl/contnrs/tfpstringhashtable.html
It has a source
Uhh...
Is the class TFPStringHashTable (and TFPCustomHashTable) actually doing a
hashmap?
The ported JCL StringHashMap is duplicate effort then after all.
Juha Manninen
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal
