Begin forwarded message:
From: Dean Zobec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri 10 Nov 2006 00:04:44 GMT+01:00
To: Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Van Canneyt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [fpc-pascal] fpcUnit todo list
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> Jonas Maebe schrieb:
> > > > The easiest thing to do is to include fpcunit itself in fcl/inc.
> > >
> > > > All the units around it can be done in fcl/fpcunit, which is built at
> > > > a later stage.
> > > >
> > > > Michael.
> > > I agree with this
Jonas Maebe schrieb:
The easiest thing to do is to include fpcunit itself in fcl/inc.
All the units around it can be done in fcl/fpcunit, which is built at
a later stage.
Michael.
I agree with this.
This arises a fundamental question: should the tests for all package
(non rtl/compiler!)
Begin forwarded message:
From: Dean Zobec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 9 november 2006 19:45:56 GMT+01:00
To: Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Van Canneyt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Graeme Geldenhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] fpcUnit todo list
