Re: [fpc-pascal]wow quite cool example you made there :)

2004-03-18 Thread Harald Houppermans
- Original Message - From: "Nikolay Nikolov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 12:04 PM Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal]wow quite cool example you made there :) > Harald Houppermans wrote: > > >WOW very interesting

Re: [fpc-pascal]wow quite cool example you made there :)

2004-03-18 Thread Harald Houppermans
- Original Message - From: "Nikolay Nikolov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 12:04 PM Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal]wow quite cool example you made there :) > Harald Houppermans wrote: > > >WOW very interesting

Re: [fpc-pascal]wow quite cool example you made there :)

2004-03-18 Thread Nikolay Nikolov
Harald Houppermans wrote: WOW very interesting indeed I thought you did it like this: asm mov CS, blabla mov IP, blabla end But now I see !!! You are actually using the parameters: CS := blabla; :) IP := blabla; :) Those interrupt parameters actually allow something which otherwise isn't

Re: [fpc-pascal]wow quite cool example you made there :)

2004-03-17 Thread Harald Houppermans
> procedure Subst; > begin > writeln('Here we are!'); > repeat until false; > end; Lol now I understand why you placed repeat until false; lol Without it it crashes :D hmmm Probably no way to recover from it... hmmm Or is there ? Hmm maybe there is :) Storing the CS and IP and then later

[fpc-pascal]wow quite cool example you made there :)

2004-03-17 Thread Harald Houppermans
Wow Did you just write this from scratch ? That's a very cool trick you did there... Replacing the CS ( code segment ) And IP ( instruction pointer ) Seems like a dirty little hack lol... like a hacker could use to execute code hehehe. Anyway I was also wondering how to proof it... This