Re: [fpc-pascal]TDBF makes assumption that breaks win32 compat

2004-06-27 Thread Michael . VanCanneyt
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Vincent Snijders wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:57:28 +0200 (CEST) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Applied. > > > > Michael. > Thanks. > > If the following patch is applied, make install works on win32. ATM, Dbf_Wtil is not > compiled on win32, but make install wants

Re: [fpc-pascal]TDBF makes assumption that breaks win32 compat

2004-06-27 Thread Vincent Snijders
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:57:28 +0200 (CEST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Applied. > > Michael. Thanks. If the following patch is applied, make install works on win32. ATM, Dbf_Wtil is not compiled on win32, but make install wants to install it. With this patch it is compiled on win32 too. Index

Re: [fpc-pascal]TDBF makes assumption that breaks win32 compat

2004-06-26 Thread Michael . VanCanneyt
On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Vincent Snijders wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:51:25 +0200 > Micha Nelissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Tony Maro schreef: > > > The TDBF assumes that if you are running FPC you are NOT in Windows. > > > Sorry this isn't a diff, but I don't have the tools in my Wind

[fpc-pascal]TDBF makes assumption that breaks win32 compat

2004-06-26 Thread Vincent Snijders
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:51:25 +0200 Micha Nelissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tony Maro schreef: > > The TDBF assumes that if you are running FPC you are NOT in Windows. > > Sorry this isn't a diff, but I don't have the tools in my Windows > > environment yet... > > > > Note the first $ifdef F