On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We are happy to announce the release of the Free Pascal Compiler version
3.0.0 "Pestering Peacock".
>
> This version includes support for, a.o., several new platforms,
codepage-aware strings, and an integrated Pascal source
Sweeet! For Linux users here is a complete FPC 3.0 release + Lazarus from
svn build script:
http://cache.getlazarus.org/download/linux/install-3.0.sh
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
> Actually my problem was with units. All my compiles failed on unit
> dependancies. I tried to recompile the units it was looking for, and
> theb copied the .ppu and .o files to /usr/lib/fpc/1.0.7/units/linux, but
> it still could not find them. copying them into the source directory
> likewize f
Actually my problem was with units. All my compiles failed on unit
dependancies. I tried to recompile the units it was looking for, and
theb copied the .ppu and .o files to /usr/lib/fpc/1.0.7/units/linux, but
it still could not find them. copying them into the source directory
likewize failed.
I
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 16:44:01 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time)
> Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > > There are some remaining bugs in the current 1.0.7, which would be nice,
> > > if they could be fixed before releasing 1.0.8: typ
>Hi,
>How much compatibility is broken between fpc-1.0.6 and fpc-laz 1.0.7 ?
>
>The reason I ask is that lazarus requires the latter, and I do not seem
>to be able to compile any of my old freepascal programs with it.
Greetings,
It is important to tell us what problems you have, since
we'
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 16:44:01 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time)
Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There are some remaining bugs in the current 1.0.7, which would be nice,
> > if they could be fixed before releasing 1.0.8: typeinfo for single and
> > double. If no one is doing that t
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 16:44:01 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time)
Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There are some remaining bugs in the current 1.0.7, which would be nice,
> > if they could be fixed before releasing 1.0.8: typeinfo for single and
> > double. If no one is doing that t
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 23:54:48 +1000
> James Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 02:41:17PM +0100, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 02:52:31PM +0200, A.J. Venter wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > How mu
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 23:54:48 +1000
James Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 02:41:17PM +0100, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 02:52:31PM +0200, A.J. Venter wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > How much compatibility is broken between fpc-1.0.6 and fpc-laz 1.0.
> >
> > Though the amount of problems seems to decrease with each new fixes version, and
> > I hope that trend continues
>
> In future will we see Lazurs start to work with the normal FPC compilers
> without the additional need to download and install the a specially
> built compiler for it ?
T
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 02:41:17PM +0100, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 02:52:31PM +0200, A.J. Venter wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > How much compatibility is broken between fpc-1.0.6 and fpc-laz 1.0.7 ?
> >
> > Why can't Lazarus be run with just the normal FPC compiler anyway ? Wh
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 23:22:05 +1000
James Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 02:52:31PM +0200, A.J. Venter wrote:
> > Hi,
> > How much compatibility is broken between fpc-1.0.6 and fpc-laz 1.0.7 ?
>
> Why can't Lazarus be run with just the normal FPC compiler anyway ? Why
>
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 02:52:31PM +0200, A.J. Venter wrote:
> > Hi,
> > How much compatibility is broken between fpc-1.0.6 and fpc-laz 1.0.7 ?
>
> Why can't Lazarus be run with just the normal FPC compiler anyway ? Why
> does it have to have a specially built compiler ?
In general, there is no
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 02:52:31PM +0200, A.J. Venter wrote:
> Hi,
> How much compatibility is broken between fpc-1.0.6 and fpc-laz 1.0.7 ?
Why can't Lazarus be run with just the normal FPC compiler anyway ? Why
does it have to have a specially built compiler ?
James
_
> Hi,
> How much compatibility is broken between fpc-1.0.6 and fpc-laz 1.0.7 ?
Lazarus uses a recent 1.0.7 snapshot. The fpc-laz is just the 1.0.7
development version that will be the next 1.0.8 release
> The reason I ask is that lazarus requires the latter, and I do not seem
> to be able to comp
On vrijdag, maa 28, 2003, at 13:52 Europe/Brussels, A.J. Venter wrote:
How much compatibility is broken between fpc-1.0.6 and fpc-laz 1.0.7 ?
Not too much hopefully, because the 1.0.x branch is the fixes branch.
Normally, compatibility is only broken there if there was a bug which
couldn't be (p
Hi,
How much compatibility is broken between fpc-1.0.6 and fpc-laz 1.0.7 ?
The reason I ask is that lazarus requires the latter, and I do not seem
to be able to compile any of my old freepascal programs with it.
Is there some way to run Lazarus (for delphi style developement) while
maintaining st
18 matches
Mail list logo
