On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 16:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
Alan Mead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> John, thanks for your reply... Sorry, I should have been clearer.
> And I typed wrong. The library was in /usr/lib but I guess FPC is
> looking for 'libgpm.so' rather than 'libgpm.so.1' .. it's the '.1'
> that fo
On 11 sep 2004, at 01:00, Alan Mead wrote:
John, thanks for your reply... Sorry, I should have been clearer.
And I typed wrong. The library was in /usr/lib but I guess FPC is
looking for 'libgpm.so' rather than 'libgpm.so.1' .. it's the '.1'
that fools FPC and it's happened before.
It's not FPC, i
--- John Coppens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 08:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
> Alan Mead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I just used the keyboard unit for the first time and it's quite
> > impressive but I have some questions.
> >
> > Initially, I couldn't link on my old RH 7.2 machi
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 08:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
Alan Mead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just used the keyboard unit for the first time and it's quite
> impressive but I have some questions.
>
> Initially, I couldn't link on my old RH 7.2 machine because FPC 1.9.4
> couldn't find the GPM libraries. Thi
I just used the keyboard unit for the first time and it's quite
impressive but I have some questions.
Initially, I couldn't link on my old RH 7.2 machine because FPC 1.9.4
couldn't find the GPM libraries. This is probably a stupid question
but is there a way that FPC can find libraries better so
