On dinsdag, jan 28, 2003, at 17:01 Europe/Brussels, John Coppens wrote:
I was gathering courage to take on debugging the actual ggiGraph unit
and
try to get it running again. Somehow I believe this makes sense as so
much
work is already done.
I'm no expert. Is SDL so much better?
It's at lea
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 11:02:43 +0100
Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Given the large amount of question about "can't find -lvga when
> compiling graph programs under linux" I would say the same about
> lib(s)vga. I also think SDL would be a better choice (though someone
> needs to do
On dinsdag, jan 28, 2003, at 11:08 Europe/Brussels, Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
Personally i would remove ggigraph support from the CVS
tree and replace with a unified (except for DOS) graph unit based on
SDL...
I think this is the way to go.. The only problem is of course
implementi
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Carl Eric Codere wrote:
> >> I can't test GGI. Maybe we should then remove all the GGI graph as it
> >> doesn't work 100% correct? Then it'll never get debugged and fixed!
> >
> >I can't remember exactly who added the GGI version to CVS, but IIRC I
> >just posted a first ve
>> I can't test GGI. Maybe we should then remove all the GGI graph as it
>> doesn't work 100% correct? Then it'll never get debugged and fixed!
>
>I can't remember exactly who added the GGI version to CVS, but IIRC I
>just posted a first version back then and clearly noted that ggigraph is
>not fi
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, John Coppens wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 14:19:56 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time)
> Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, John Coppens wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all...
> > >
> > > I've been needing quick & dirty graphing capability, and
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 14:19:56 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time)
Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, John Coppens wrote:
>
> > Hi all...
> >
> > I've been needing quick & dirty graphing capability, and I'm missing
> > the old graph library. I know - I have the
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, John Coppens wrote:
> Hi all...
>
> I've been needing quick & dirty graphing capability, and I'm missing the
> old graph library. I know - I have the graph lib working, but the frequent
> swaps in and out of X11 are not really very comfortable.
>
> As is, I have not found an
