> On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> | I think the best thing would be to find out what exactly hinders newer
> | FPC versions, make a few mods and compile a matching version locally.
>
> Are you talking about compiling a local FPC version, or about changing the
> mysql unit?
Having
>
> Shouldn't FreePascal automatically skip all code which is not
> required/used?
> Especially in a procedural environment it should be relatively easy to
> find
> out at compile time, which functions/procedures are used or not.
> So the compiler should be able -- especially when the unit source i
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Marco van de Voort wrote:
| I think the best thing would be to find out what exactly hinders newer
| FPC versions, make a few mods and compile a matching version locally.
Are you talking about compiling a local FPC version, or about changing the
mysql unit?
I never compiled my
> Hello!
>
> I wrote a unit for using MySQL a long time ago. It is basically the mysql
> unit, but with some modified/added functions to make life easier. But it is
> still procedural (currently not OOP).
>
> Now I added some functions which allow me to access SQL data fields by
> their name and
Hello!
I wrote a unit for using MySQL a long time ago. It is basically the mysql
unit, but with some modified/added functions to make life easier. But it is
still procedural (currently not OOP).
Now I added some functions which allow me to access SQL data fields by
their name and some other minor
