On 2012-11-09 12:11, ik wrote:
>
> Qt5 afaik, does not support X11 anymore, only wayland, and that's the
> main path most Linux toolkits takes today.
As far as I know, they are simply moving more to XCB (the replacement
libary for XLib). Saying that, all (big five at least) Linux distros
already
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
> > I'm not sure why, because as far as I know, it replaces the X11
> > protocol, not gdk, Qt etc...
>
> That is how I understood it too.
>
> A while back I thought of starting the API bindings for fpGUI's Wayland
> backend. But I was told that the
On 09/11/12 11:06, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 2012-11-09 10:42, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>> IOW, I wouldn't desperately try to support Wayland native at this point.
>>
>> That can be done if the native api turns out to be stable, Wayland truely
>> takes over X11, and all distros package it.
>>
On Friday 09 of November 2012 13:11:27 ik wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys
>
> wrote:
> > On 2012-11-09 10:42, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> >> IOW, I wouldn't desperately try to support Wayland native at this point.
> >>
> >> That can be done if the native api turns out
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
> On 2012-11-09 10:42, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>> IOW, I wouldn't desperately try to support Wayland native at this point.
>>
>> That can be done if the native api turns out to be stable, Wayland truely
>> takes over X11, and all distros p
On 2012-11-09 10:42, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> IOW, I wouldn't desperately try to support Wayland native at this point.
>
> That can be done if the native api turns out to be stable, Wayland truely
> takes over X11, and all distros package it.
>
> Now it is just asking for pain IMHO.
+1
That's
Am 09.11.2012 11:36, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
On 2012-11-09 09:51, ik wrote:
I'm not sure why, because as far as I know, it replaces the X11
protocol, not gdk, Qt etc...
That is how I understood it too.
A while back I thought of starting the API bindings for fpGUI's Wayland
backend. But I wa
Am 09.11.2012 10:51, schrieb ik:
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
On 08.11.2012 22:35, ik wrote:
Hello,
It seems that many GUI toolkits are slowly starting to move to wayland
(http://wayland.freedesktop.org/), that moved to v1.0
Is there anyone who currently working on bindi
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
>
> That is how I understood it too.
>
> A while back I thought of starting the API bindings for fpGUI's Wayland
> backend. But I was told that the Wayland API is still in flux. Unlike Qt
> or GTK, I don't have so much resources to spend on a movin
On 2012-11-09 09:51, ik wrote:
>
> I'm not sure why, because as far as I know, it replaces the X11
> protocol, not gdk, Qt etc...
That is how I understood it too.
A while back I thought of starting the API bindings for fpGUI's Wayland
backend. But I was told that the Wayland API is still in flux
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
> On 08.11.2012 22:35, ik wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> It seems that many GUI toolkits are slowly starting to move to wayland
>> (http://wayland.freedesktop.org/), that moved to v1.0
>> Is there anyone who currently working on binding for it for FPC
On 08.11.2012 22:35, ik wrote:
Hello,
It seems that many GUI toolkits are slowly starting to move to wayland
(http://wayland.freedesktop.org/), that moved to v1.0
Is there anyone who currently working on binding for it for FPC ?
It might be better to ask this on the Lazarus list as Wayland sup
Hello,
It seems that many GUI toolkits are slowly starting to move to wayland
(http://wayland.freedesktop.org/), that moved to v1.0
Is there anyone who currently working on binding for it for FPC ?
Ido
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepa
13 matches
Mail list logo
