> Marc Santhoff wrote:
> >>This is no magic, see fpc.cfg
> >
> > But it looks that way, I was asking myself if I've left something out
> > because the binary shrunk from 520kB to 360kB. ;)
>
> IIRC, defining the symbol RELEASE means compiling in release mode. (Thus
> your internal switch does "
Marc Santhoff wrote:
>>This is no magic, see fpc.cfg
>
> But it looks that way, I was asking myself if I've left something out
> because the binary shrunk from 520kB to 360kB. ;)
IIRC, defining the symbol RELEASE means compiling in release mode. (Thus
your internal switch does "interfere" with com
Am Di, den 15.02.2005 schrieb Peter Vreman um 18:20:
[...]
> This is no magic, see fpc.cfg
But it looks that way, I was asking myself if I've left something out
because the binary shrunk from 520kB to 360kB. ;)
Thank you,
Marc
___
fpc-pascal maillist
> Hi,
>
> today I've compiled my program the first time with a newly invented
> switch in my source. This program depends on some information compiled
> in differently for the testbed and the to be released version.
>
> For obvious reasons I called my descriptor switch "RELEASE" and
> surrounded th
Hi,
today I've compiled my program the first time with a newly invented
switch in my source. This program depends on some information compiled
in differently for the testbed and the to be released version.
For obvious reasons I called my descriptor switch "RELEASE" and
surrounded the code with "#
