Am Samstag, den 06.05.2006, 19:36 +0300 schrieb Geno Roupsky:
>
>
> 2006/5/6, Marc Santhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Am Freitag, den 05.05.2006, 11:03 +0300 schrieb Geno Roupsky:
> > In fact you could have different function for every kind of
> sort and
> > switch th
2006/5/6, Marc Santhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Am Freitag, den 05.05.2006, 11:03 +0300 schrieb Geno Roupsky:> In fact you could have different function for every kind of sort and> switch them on the fly when the properties determining the kind of> sort that should be made changes. In my experience th
Am Freitag, den 05.05.2006, 11:03 +0300 schrieb Geno Roupsky:
> In fact you could have different function for every kind of sort and
> switch them on the fly when the properties determining the kind of
> sort that should be made changes. In my experience there is no much
> code duplication involved
2006/5/2, Marc Santhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,i wonder why the declaration of the comparing function of list objectsis the way it is:TListSortCompare = function (Item1, Item2: Pointer): Integer;Since I am writing a class that sorts a list it owns depending on
another property naming the property
Hi,
i wonder why the declaration of the comparing function of list objects
is the way it is:
TListSortCompare = function (Item1, Item2: Pointer): Integer;
Since I am writing a class that sorts a list it owns depending on
another property naming the property of the list items for sorting, I
would
