On 30 mei 2006, at 12:10, Пётр Косаревский wrote:
The compiler already gives unit information in case you have
conflicting types for making it easier to debug such problems. I
don't see why it shouldn't do the same for used function definitions.
This is fpc-pascal maillist, I don't insist, th
> The compiler already gives unit information in case you have
> conflicting types for making it easier to debug such problems. I
> don't see why it shouldn't do the same for used function definitions.
> Jonas
program A; // "Bad" program
uses sysutils,windows;
const B:shortstring='1.txt';
begi
> > i would have beat my head against a wall for days on a problem like that.
It was absolutely unexpected by me. You saw: unit order matter very much and
both units may be without sources (people are not supposed to install sources
every time).
Signalling error "wrong type", when I have correc
Jonas Maebe schreef:
On 30 mei 2006, at 08:37, Vincent Snijders wrote:
i would have beat my head against a wall for days on a problem like
that.
Using the wrong tool for the wrong job, I would say. A compiler is to
compiler, an IDE to write code.
The compiler already gives unit informatio
On 30 mei 2006, at 08:37, Vincent Snijders wrote:
i would have beat my head against a wall for days on a problem
like that.
Using the wrong tool for the wrong job, I would say. A compiler is
to compiler, an IDE to write code.
The compiler already gives unit information in case you have
Tony Pelton schreef:
On 5/29/06, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Use a IDE with code tools that support find declaration.
that is a terrible answer.
this isn't the "IDE" list, it is the Free Pascal "compiler" list.
Indeed. But sometimes the compiler doesn't give enough informa
On 5/29/06, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Use a IDE with code tools that support find declaration.
that is a terrible answer.
this isn't the "IDE" list, it is the Free Pascal "compiler" list.
i would have beat my head against a wall for days on a problem like that.
i would sug
> > While compiler gives a hint about "true" declaration, it does not point to
> > the problematic unit.
> Use a IDE with code tools that support find declaration.
> In your case Lazarus would for example have jumped to an include file that
> that
> contains the wrong declaration. Search include
Пётр Косаревский schreef:
The problem is that Apple's universal interfaces also include a
"round" function, which returns a real instead of an integral type.
How can one find such a thing himself without trial&error?
Some time ago I had a similar problem with "bool DeleteFile(PChar)" functi
> The problem is that Apple's universal interfaces also include a
> "round" function, which returns a real instead of an integral type.
How can one find such a thing himself without trial&error?
Some time ago I had a similar problem with "bool DeleteFile(PChar)" function in
Windows API and s
On 29 mei 2006, at 14:46, Thomas Miller wrote:
I am frustrated by a very simple problem. I am trying to convert
real to integer, using free pascal for mac. I am an old Think
Pascal user who just recently found free pascal and, while thrilled
to have a pascal compiler for mac OSX, I am s
Thomas Miller schreef:
I am frustrated by a very simple problem. I am trying to convert real
to integer, using free pascal for mac. I am an old Think Pascal user
who just recently found free pascal and, while thrilled to have a pascal
compiler for mac OSX, I am still a bit lost. In Think Pa
I am frustrated by a very simple problem. I am trying to convert
real to integer, using free pascal for mac. I am an old Think Pascal
user who just recently found free pascal and, while thrilled to have
a pascal compiler for mac OSX, I am still a bit lost. In Think
Pascal, I would have
13 matches
Mail list logo
