Re: [fpc-pascal] make fpc

2010-11-22 Thread Brian Winfrey
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Jonas Maebe wrote: > > On 21 Nov 2010, at 19:03, Brian Winfrey wrote: > >> What version should fpc display (Revision: 16393). >> >> When I get latest and make /usr/bin/fpc is at version 2.4.2. >> >> fpc -vut dummy.pas >> ... >> Compiler: /usr/lib/fpc/2.4.2/ppc386 >

Re: [fpc-pascal] make fpc

2010-11-22 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 21 Nov 2010, at 19:03, Brian Winfrey wrote: What version should fpc display (Revision: 16393). When I get latest and make /usr/bin/fpc is at version 2.4.2. fpc -vut dummy.pas ... Compiler: /usr/lib/fpc/2.4.2/ppc386 Using executable path: /usr/lib/fpc/2.4.2/ Using unit path: /usr/lib/fpc/2.

Re: [fpc-pascal] Make FPC closer to hardware

2008-11-18 Thread leledumbo
Frank Peelo wrote: > > yes, but for example you /don't/ need to write your own write routines. > (You *can't* write writeln in Pascal!) > I know, I'm just saying Write routines, doesn't have to be the same as Write(Ln) which has variable number of arguments. I'm writing one for each type (.i

Re: [fpc-pascal] Make FPC closer to hardware

2008-11-18 Thread Frank Peelo
leledumbo wrote: Well, it's just an example. I'm saying that because the need of file system support is quite frustrating that I need to write my own write routines. yes, but for example you /don't/ need to write your own write routines. (You *can't* write writeln in Pascal!) You can implement

Re: [fpc-pascal] Make FPC closer to hardware

2008-11-17 Thread leledumbo
Well, it's just an example. I'm saying that because the need of file system support is quite frustrating that I need to write my own write routines. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Make-FPC-closer-to-hardware-tp20513082p20553612.html Sent from the Free Pascal - General mai

Re: [fpc-pascal] Make FPC closer to hardware

2008-11-17 Thread Frank Peelo
leledumbo wrote: Micha Nelissen wrote: example? Let Write(Ln) work without file system support? Perhaps just by supplying a routine to write one character, and let other write routines use it. I think it already has what you want there. Doesn't call a function for each char, though.

Re: [fpc-pascal] Make FPC closer to hardware

2008-11-17 Thread Florian Klaempfl
leledumbo schrieb: Micha Nelissen wrote: example? Let Write(Ln) work without file system support? Perhaps just by supplying a routine to write one character, and let other write routines use it. Too slow in the common use case. ___ fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] Make FPC closer to hardware

2008-11-16 Thread leledumbo
Micha Nelissen wrote: > > example? > Let Write(Ln) work without file system support? Perhaps just by supplying a routine to write one character, and let other write routines use it. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Make-FPC-closer-to-hardware-tp20513082p20533138.html

Re: [fpc-pascal] Make FPC closer to hardware

2008-11-15 Thread Micha Nelissen
leledumbo wrote: Would it be a good idea to lower down (again) FPC so that it can be used easier for systems programming? example? Micha ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-

[fpc-pascal] Make FPC closer to hardware

2008-11-14 Thread leledumbo
Would it be a good idea to lower down (again) FPC so that it can be used easier for systems programming? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Make-FPC-closer-to-hardware-tp20513082p20513082.html Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __