On 29/06/07, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, they were used for the same reason as you. They can be used when
you implement a system which needs not all available options: descend
from them, and implement just what you need.
Michael.
Thanks for the quick response Michael.
S
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 29/06/07, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > No, they were used for the same reason as you. They can be used when
> > you implement a system which needs not all available options: descend
> > from them, and implement just wha
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the point/purpose of the TFPEmptyFont, TFPEmptyBrush,
> TFPEmptyXXX etc. classes?
> They come in handy while I am implementing (converting) the fpGUI
> canvas class to descend from the TFPCanvas class, so I don't get
> abstract err
Hi,
What is the point/purpose of the TFPEmptyFont, TFPEmptyBrush,
TFPEmptyXXX etc. classes?
They come in handy while I am implementing (converting) the fpGUI
canvas class to descend from the TFPCanvas class, so I don't get
abstract errors at runtime.
But do they serve another purpose?
Regards,
