On 06/12/17 19:32, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Yes, but since no one compiles the package manually, it is unnecessary.
Hi Mattias,
Yes, it is unnecessary, but I suppose that many people could try to
compile the packages as a first approach to the project as I did, just
to test if everything comp
> Victor Campillo hat am 6. Dezember 2017 um 12:48
> geschrieben:
>[...]
> o It does not include the command to call pas2js compiler.
Correct. pas2js does not support ppu files (yet), so it compiles all units
everytime. For the same reason the package is set to build manually.
> o Adding t
On Wed, 6 Dec 2017, Victor Campillo wrote:
On 06/12/17 15:19, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Change line 300 to
for i := low(DefaultLongOpts) to Length(DefaultLongOpts)-1 do
and it should compile again.
Michael.
Hi,
Yes, that change solves the problem.
Regarding the rtl package, in the
On 06/12/17 15:19, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Change line 300 to
for i := low(DefaultLongOpts) to Length(DefaultLongOpts)-1 do
and it should compile again.
Michael.
Hi,
Yes, that change solves the problem.
Regarding the rtl package, in the folder rtl there are two units that
are not in
On Wed, 6 Dec 2017, Victor Campillo wrote:
On 06/12/17 14:33, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Thank you very much for your remarks!
I have fixed all issues and re-uploaded the file:
http://www.freepascal.org/~michael/pas2js/pas2js-demo-0.8.37.zip
Hi Michael,
Thank you, now in package fpcunit
On 06/12/17 14:33, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Thank you very much for your remarks!
I have fixed all issues and re-uploaded the file:
http://www.freepascal.org/~michael/pas2js/pas2js-demo-0.8.37.zip
Hi Michael,
Thank you, now in package fpcunit I get this error.
consoletestrunner.pas(300,40
On Wed, 6 Dec 2017, Victor Campillo wrote:
Hi,
Testing the preview that Michael was so kind to share, I found the next
minor problems trying to compile the packages included, I think that
everything is related to that the project is work in progress so nothing
to worry much about.
* Pac
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Victor Campillo
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Testing the preview that Michael was so kind to share, I found the next
> minor problems trying to compile the packages included, I think that
> everything is related to that the project is work in progress so nothing to
> worry much
Hi,
Testing the preview that Michael was so kind to share, I found the next
minor problems trying to compile the packages included, I think that
everything is related to that the project is work in progress so nothing
to worry much about.
* Package fcl_base
o The package is configured
