> Tom Walsh schrieb:
> > Is there a compelling reason NOT to use GNU make for the fpc projects?
>
> Main problem: you can't express the cyclic interdependencies pascal
> units can have.
- Having to ship an external binary (or on *nix lay a dependancy).
- Expansion (more syntax/commands) mostly v
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Tom Walsh wrote:
>
>> I am starting work on one fpc project and planning another. The current
>> project will be for an x86 target, the planned project would be on ARM.
>> I'm
>> confused by the inclusion of a make utility within the fpc package.
>
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Tom Walsh wrote:
> I am starting work on one fpc project and planning another. The current
> project will be for an x86 target, the planned project would be on ARM. I'm
> confused by the inclusion of a make utility within the fpc package.
>
> Is there a compelling reason
Tom Walsh schrieb:
> Is there a compelling reason NOT to use GNU make for the fpc projects?
Main problem: you can't express the cyclic interdependencies pascal
units can have.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.free
I am starting work on one fpc project and planning another. The current
project will be for an x86 target, the planned project would be on ARM.
I'm confused by the inclusion of a make utility within the fpc package.
Is there a compelling reason NOT to use GNU make for the fpc projects?
Is t
