Re: [fpc-pascal] fcl-passrc example program, and a couple of bugreports

2010-04-28 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 28 Apr 2010, at 09:26, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: Good idea. Are all possible constructs in FPC in the testsuite ? Probably not, but a lot of them are. Jonas ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.o

Re: [fpc-pascal] fcl-passrc example program, and a couple of bugreports

2010-04-28 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Florian Klaempfl said: > > I created a VERY small test sample in utils/fpdoc, it tests 'strange' > > cases. It would indeed be a good idea to create a testsuite in > > fcl-passrc itself. > > Wouldn't it be enough just to let it scan/parse the whole fpc test suite :)? That

Re: [fpc-pascal] fcl-passrc example program, and a couple of bugreports

2010-04-28 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, Florian Klaempfl wrote: Michael Van Canneyt schrieb: On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Marco van de Voort wrote: In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said: As soon as I get around to some bugfixing, I'll have a look at these. Shouldn't we create some testsuite for fcl-

Re: [fpc-pascal] fcl-passrc example program, and a couple of bugreports

2010-04-28 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb: > > > On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Marco van de Voort wrote: > >> In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said: >>> >>> As soon as I get around to some bugfixing, I'll have a look at these. >> >> Shouldn't we create some testsuite for fcl-passrc? (or have a flag in the

Re: [fpc-pascal] fcl-passrc example program, and a couple of bugreports

2010-04-28 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Marco van de Voort wrote: In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said: As soon as I get around to some bugfixing, I'll have a look at these. Shouldn't we create some testsuite for fcl-passrc? (or have a flag in the existing testsuite to exclude tests from fcl-pas

Re: [fpc-pascal] fcl-passrc example program, and a couple of bugreports

2010-04-27 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said: > > As soon as I get around to some bugfixing, I'll have a look at these. Shouldn't we create some testsuite for fcl-passrc? (or have a flag in the existing testsuite to exclude tests from fcl-passrc or real compiler tests or so?) _

Re: [fpc-pascal] fcl-passrc example program, and a couple of bugreports

2010-04-27 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Sven Barth wrote: Hi! On 27.04.2010 17:19, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: Also, program files are not parsed by fcl-passrc, it's limited to units for now. We would like to be able to eventually parse program files too. I am all for it. It should not be hard to handle thi

Re: [fpc-pascal] fcl-passrc example program, and a couple of bugreports

2010-04-27 Thread Sven Barth
Hi! On 27.04.2010 17:19, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: Also, program files are not parsed by fcl-passrc, it's limited to units for now. We would like to be able to eventually parse program files too. I am all for it. It should not be hard to handle this; It's like parsing an implementation bloc

Re: [fpc-pascal] fcl-passrc example program, and a couple of bugreports

2010-04-27 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Michalis Kamburelis wrote: All the talk about the Pascal parser in fcl-passrc got me interested recently. I did some experiments, and I thought I mention here: 1. I added a simplest example how to use fcl-passrc to the wiki: http://wiki.freepascal.org/fcl-passrc This i

[fpc-pascal] fcl-passrc example program, and a couple of bugreports

2010-04-25 Thread Michalis Kamburelis
All the talk about the Pascal parser in fcl-passrc got me interested recently. I did some experiments, and I thought I mention here: 1. I added a simplest example how to use fcl-passrc to the wiki: http://wiki.freepascal.org/fcl-passrc 2. And reported a couple of bugs found in fpdoc (tested on P