On 3 mei 2006, at 06:37, John Coppens wrote:
I see your reasoning, but I do not understand why eof doesn't return
always. The eof is not a 'wait for eof', but a test. If we're _not_ at
the end of the file, the program should return with false, at least
how I
understand it.
It is not possib
On Tue, 02 May 2006 14:42:00 -0400
Bob Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Coppens wrote:
>
> > program testeof;
> >
> > begin
> > if eof then
> > writeln('EOF found')
> > else
> > writeln('No EOF found');
> > end.
> >
> > This sample program doesn't return till is pressed.
John Coppens wrote:
> program testeof;
>
> begin
> if eof then
> writeln('EOF found')
> else
> writeln('No EOF found');
> end.
>
> This sample program doesn't return till is pressed.
That's correct and reasonable. You are terminating your program after an EOL
(ENTER), If
you send
Hi all.
While modifying some older programs, I found a strange effect with eof
(input). When calling eof(input), the program needs an key to
continue. I just downloaded 2.0.2, with the same result.
The definition of eof (according to the FPC docs) is that it immediately
returns... which is what
Hi all.
While modifying some older programs, I found a strange effect with eof
(input). When calling eof(input), the program needs an key to
continue.
The definition of eof (according to the FPC docs) is that it immediately
returns... which is what I need. Can anyone suggest a solution for this
