On 03/15/2014 03:20 PM, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
I added the last sentence which may help you to avoid false assumptions:
Well done !
OTHO, IMHO this perfectly documents that the decision (supposedly by
Borland) ) to do it this way is a very nasty and the conceptional
difference between St
On Sat, 15 Mar 2014, Xiangrong Fang wrote:
Thanks, this is important to know!
The latest version of the docs mentions this explicitly:
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/ref/refsu18.html#x42-460003.3.1
Michael.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pa
Thanks, this is important to know!
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Am 2014-03-15 15:06, schrieb Xiangrong Fang:
> I just want to confirm one thing:
> var
> a, b: array of Integer;
> begin
> SetLength(a, 100);
> SetLength(b, 100);
> a := b;
> end.
> Now "a" will point to the same memory block as "b". Since dynamic arrays are
ref counted,
> I don't need to
Hi there,
I just want to confirm one thing:
var
a, b: array of Integer;
begin
SetLength(a, 100);
SetLength(b, 100);
a := b;
end.
Now "a" will point to the same memory block as "b". Since dynamic arrays
are ref counted, I don't need to worry about the memory originally
allocated for "a",
