Re: [fpc-pascal] docs on freepascal.org vs lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net

2013-10-20 Thread Michal Wallace
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 4:47 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > That the lazarus project generates their docs from the current trunk > version is unfortunate, especially since they actually use a released > version of the FPC compiler. > > FPC does not have the manpower to support multiple release

Re: [fpc-pascal] docs on freepascal.org vs lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net

2013-10-20 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013, Michal Wallace wrote: So... The top google result for "free pascal TComponent" is:    http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/classes/tcomponent.html This is 8 months old. The updated page doesn't show up in the results at all:     http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/do

Re: [fpc-pascal] docs on freepascal.org vs lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net

2013-10-20 Thread Sven Barth
Am 20.10.2013 09:47 schrieb "Michal Wallace" : > > So... > > The top google result for "free pascal TComponent" is: > >http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/classes/tcomponent.html > > This is 8 months old. The updated page doesn't show up in the results at all: > > http://lazarus-ccr.sou

[fpc-pascal] docs on freepascal.org vs lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net

2013-10-20 Thread Michal Wallace
So... The top google result for "free pascal TComponent" is: http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/classes/tcomponent.html This is 8 months old. The updated page doesn't show up in the results at all: http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/docs/rtl/classes/tcomponent.html I find this unfo