Am Dienstag, den 25.09.2007, 19:59 -0700 schrieb Leonardo M. RamX:
> An aproximation of what you want to accomplish is the usage of classes
> (descendants of
> TPersistent) with published properties accesed using RTTI. The
> "visible" fields you want to access
> are these published properties, all
An aproximation of what you want to accomplish is the usage of classes
(descendants of
TPersistent) with published properties accesed using RTTI. The "visible" fields
you want to access
are these published properties, all other information and methods can't be
accessed using RTTI.
TCustomer = c
Am Dienstag, den 25.09.2007, 11:56 +0200 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
> On 25 Sep 2007, at 11:49, Marc Santhoff wrote:
>
> > would it be possible to set up a memory structure according to fpc's
> > aligning rules that will be accepted as a record typed variable? Or
> > does
> > fpc create some informati
On 25 Sep 2007, at 11:49, Marc Santhoff wrote:
would it be possible to set up a memory structure according to fpc's
aligning rules that will be accepted as a record typed variable? Or
does
fpc create some informational support items that would miss in this
case?
I'm in doubt, since it is no
Hi,
would it be possible to set up a memory structure according to fpc's
aligning rules that will be accepted as a record typed variable? Or does
fpc create some informational support items that would miss in this
case?
I'm in doubt, since it is normally not possible (AFAIK, tell me if this
is wr
