On Sat, October 27, 2012 22:56, waldo kitty wrote:
> On 10/27/2012 16:23, Tomas Hajny wrote:
> [trim]
>>> *if i'm reading this properly*, what is confusing me is the first one
>>> allocates less memory blocks and uses more heap whereas the second one
>>> allocates (a lot) more memory blocks (55000
On 10/27/2012 16:23, Tomas Hajny wrote:
[trim]
*if i'm reading this properly*, what is confusing me is the first one
allocates less memory blocks and uses more heap whereas the second one
allocates (a lot) more memory blocks (55000 more??) but uses much less
heap...
The number of blocks is high
On Sat, October 27, 2012 21:33, waldo kitty wrote:
> i'm trying to figure out the best numbers to use for setting up a sorted
> collection... i'm just not understanding the numbers i'm getting from the
> heapdump unit at the end of the run...
>
> i have two collections (/details at the end/)... th
i'm trying to figure out the best numbers to use for setting up a sorted
collection... i'm just not understanding the numbers i'm getting from the
heapdump unit at the end of the run...
i have two collections (/details at the end/)... these collections can be pretty
"large" (~4 entries f